Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timothée Lacroix

dblp:190/7096 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Knowledge graphs · 73% Data mining · 27%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 62% Language models and text generation · 38%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge graphs
link prediction
0.822020
Tensor Decompositions for Temporal Knowledge Base Completion · ICLR 2020
Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completion · ICML 2018
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
formal theorem proving
0.712023
Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs · ICLR 2023
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated theorem proving
neural theorem proving
0.612022
HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Proving · NeurIPS 2022
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
proof search
0.612022
HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Proving · NeurIPS 2022
Knowledge graphs › link prediction
temporal knowledge graph completion
0.412020
Tensor Decompositions for Temporal Knowledge Base Completion · ICLR 2020
Data mining › multidimensional data analysis › multiway data analysis › tensor analysis
tensor factorization
0.412020
Tensor Decompositions for Temporal Knowledge Base Completion · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tensor decomposition
0.312018
Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completion · ICML 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.3formal theorem prover · 1.3tensor nuclear p-norm regularization · 0.7complex · 0.7transformer · 0.6online training · 0.6monte carlo tree search · 0.6tensor decomposition · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs
Albert Q. Jiang, Sean Welleck, Jin Peng Zhou, Timothée Lacroix, Jiacheng Liu 0010, Mateja Jamnik, Guillaume Lample, Yuhuai Wu
ICLR4
2022 HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Proving
abstract
We propose an online training procedure for a transformer-based automated theorem prover. Our approach leverages a new search algorithm, HyperTree Proof Search (HTPS), that learns from previous proof searches through online training, allowing it to generalize to domains far from the training distribution. We report detailed ablations of our pipeline’s main components by studying performance on three environments of increasing complexity. In particular, we show that with HTPS alone, a model trained on annotated proofs manages to prove 65.4% of a held-out set of Metamath theorems, significantly outperforming the previous state of the art of 56.5% by GPT-f. Online training on these unproved theorems increases accuracy to 82.6%. With a similar computational budget, we improve the state of the art on the Lean-based miniF2F-curriculum dataset from 31% to 42% proving accuracy.
Guillaume Lample, Timothée Lacroix, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Aurélien Rodriguez, Amaury Hayat, Thibaut Lavril, Gabriel Ebner, Xavier Martinet
NeurIPS2
2020 Tensor Decompositions for Temporal Knowledge Base Completion
Timothée Lacroix, Guillaume Obozinski, Nicolas Usunier
ICLR1
2018 Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completion
abstract
The problem of Knowledge Base Completion can be framed as a 3rd-order binary tensor completion problem. In this light, the Canonical Tensor Decomposition (CP) seems like a natural solution; however, current implementations of CP on standard Knowledge Base Completion benchmarks are lagging behind their competitors. In this work, we attempt to understand the limits of CP for knowledge base completion. First, we motivate and test a novel regularizer, based on tensor nuclear p-norms. Then, we present a reformulation of the problem that makes it invariant to arbitrary choices in the inclusion of predicates or their reciprocals in the dataset. These two methods combined allow us to beat the current state of the art on several datasets with a CP decomposition, and obtain even better results using the more advanced ComplEx model.
Timothée Lacroix, Nicolas Usunier, Guillaume Obozinski
ICML1