Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timothée Lacroix
dblp:190/7096
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Knowledge graphs · 73% Data mining · 27% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 62% Language models and text generation · 38% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Tensor Decompositions for Temporal Knowledge Base Completion · ICLR 2020 Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completion · ICML 2018 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
formal theorem proving |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs · ICLR 2023 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated theorem proving
neural theorem proving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Proving · NeurIPS 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
proof search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Proving · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge graphs › link prediction
temporal knowledge graph completion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Decompositions for Temporal Knowledge Base Completion · ICLR 2020 |
Data mining › multidimensional data analysis › multiway data analysis › tensor analysis
tensor factorization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Decompositions for Temporal Knowledge Base Completion · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tensor decomposition |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completion · ICML 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.3formal theorem prover · 1.3tensor nuclear p-norm regularization · 0.7complex · 0.7transformer · 0.6online training · 0.6monte carlo tree search · 0.6tensor decomposition · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs
Albert Q. Jiang, Sean Welleck, Jin Peng Zhou, Timothée Lacroix, Jiacheng Liu 0010, Mateja Jamnik, Guillaume Lample, Yuhuai Wu |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem ProvingabstractWe propose an online training procedure for a transformer-based automated theorem prover. Our approach leverages a new search algorithm, HyperTree Proof Search (HTPS), that learns from previous proof searches through online training, allowing it to generalize to domains far from the training distribution. We report detailed ablations of our pipeline’s main components by studying performance on three environments of increasing complexity. In particular, we show that with HTPS alone, a model trained on annotated proofs manages to prove 65.4% of a held-out set of Metamath theorems, significantly outperforming the previous state of the art of 56.5% by GPT-f. Online training on these unproved theorems increases accuracy to 82.6%. With a similar computational budget, we improve the state of the art on the Lean-based miniF2F-curriculum dataset from 31% to 42% proving accuracy. Guillaume Lample, Timothée Lacroix, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Aurélien Rodriguez, Amaury Hayat, Thibaut Lavril, Gabriel Ebner, Xavier Martinet |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Tensor Decompositions for Temporal Knowledge Base Completion
Timothée Lacroix, Guillaume Obozinski, Nicolas Usunier |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2018 | Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base CompletionabstractThe problem of Knowledge Base Completion can be framed as a 3rd-order binary tensor completion problem. In this light, the Canonical Tensor Decomposition (CP) seems like a natural solution; however, current implementations of CP on standard Knowledge Base Completion benchmarks are lagging behind their competitors. In this work, we attempt to understand the limits of CP for knowledge base completion. First, we motivate and test a novel regularizer, based on tensor nuclear p-norms. Then, we present a reformulation of the problem that makes it invariant to arbitrary choices in the inclusion of predicates or their reciprocals in the dataset. These two methods combined allow us to beat the current state of the art on several datasets with a CP decomposition, and obtain even better results using the more advanced ComplEx model. Timothée Lacroix, Nicolas Usunier, Guillaume Obozinski |
ICML | 1 |