Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Trevor Gale
dblp:190/7144
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3927-9267ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 84% 3D vision · 12% Deep learning architectures and training · 4% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.3 | 3 | 2020 | Sparse GPU kernels for deep learning · SC 2020 Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winners · ICML 2020 Fast Sparse ConvNets · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse neural network |
1.3 | 3 | 2020 | Sparse GPU kernels for deep learning · SC 2020 Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winners · ICML 2020 Fast Sparse ConvNets · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud processing
sparse convolution |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fast Sparse ConvNets · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winners · ICML 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse GPU kernels for deep learning · SC 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse GPU kernels for deep learning · SC 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
neural network accelerator |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Fast Sparse ConvNets · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse matrix-dense matrix multiplication · 0.9sparse kernels · 0.9sampled dense-dense matrix multiplication · 0.9depthwise separable convolution · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Fast Autoscheduling for Sparse ML FrameworksabstractThe rapid growth in the size of deep learning models strains the capabilities of dense computation paradigms. Leveraging sparse computation has become increasingly popular for training and deploying large-scale models, but existing deep learning frameworks lack extensive support for sparse operations. Current approaches either require manual scheduling expertise or rely on exhaustive search taking hours to days, which are both incompatible with the interactive development essential to machine learning research. We present three algorithmic contributions that enable fast, automatic optimization of sparse tensor computations. First, we develop a heuristic-based loop ordering algorithm that avoids asymptotic performance cliffs while compiling in milliseconds rather than hours. Second, we introduce a tiling algorithm specialized for mixed sparse-dense computations that achieves performance comparable to hand-optimized kernels. Third, we present a format inference algorithm that automatically selects appropriate sparse tensor formats for intermediate and output tensors based on operation semantics. These algorithms are grounded in the computational properties of sparse tensor algebra, making them predictable and robust across diverse workloads. We implement these techniques in Scorch, a prototype sparse tensor compiler for PyTorch that demonstrates their practical effectiveness. With only minimal code changes, our approach achieves 1.05–5.80× speedups over PyTorch Sparse on end-to-end tasks including graph neural networks, sparse autoencoders, and sparse transformers, with compilation times fast enough for interactive ML development. Bobby Yan, Alexander J. Root, Trevor Gale, David Broman, Fredrik Kjolstad |
CGO | 3 |
| 2020 | Fast Sparse ConvNetsabstractHistorically, the pursuit of efficient inference has been one of the driving forces behind the research into new deep learning architectures and building blocks. Some of the recent examples include: the squeeze-and-excitation module, depthwise separable convolutions in Xception, and the inverted bottleneck in MobileNet v2. Notably, in all of these cases, the resulting building blocks enabled not only higher efficiency, but also higher accuracy, and found wide adoption in the field. In this work, we further expand the arsenal of efficient building blocks for neural network architectures; but instead of combining standard primitives (such as convolution), we advocate for the replacement of these dense primitives with their sparse counterparts. While the idea of using sparsity to decrease the parameter count is not new, the conventional wisdom is that this reduction in theoretical FLOPs does not translate into real-world efficiency gains. We aim to correct this misconception by introducing a family of efficient sparse kernels for several hardware platforms, which we plan to open source for the benefit of the community. Equipped with our efficient implementation of sparse primitives, we show that sparse versions of MobileNet v1 and MobileNet v2 architectures substantially outperform strong dense baselines on the efficiency-accuracy curve. On Snapdragon 835 our sparse networks outperform their dense equivalents by 1.3 - 2.4× - equivalent to approximately one entire generation of improvement. We hope that our findings will facilitate wider adoption of sparsity as a tool for creating efficient and accurate deep learning architectures. Erich Elsen, Marat Dukhan, Trevor Gale, Karen Simonyan |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2020 | Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersabstractMany applications require sparse neural networks due to space or inference time restrictions. There is a large body of work on training dense networks to yield sparse networks for inference, but this limits the size of the largest trainable sparse model to that of the largest trainable dense model. In this paper we introduce a method to train sparse neural networks with a fixed parameter count and a fixed computational cost throughout training, without sacrificing accuracy relative to existing dense-to-sparse training methods. Our method updates the topology of the sparse network during training by using parameter magnitudes and infrequent gradient calculations. We show that this approach requires fewer floating-point operations (FLOPs) to achieve a given level of accuracy compared to prior techniques. We demonstrate state-of-the-art sparse training results on a variety of networks and datasets, including ResNet-50, MobileNets on Imagenet-2012, and RNNs on WikiText-103. Finally, we provide some insights into why allowing the topology to change during the optimization can overcome local minima encountered when the topology remains static. Utku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro, Erich Elsen |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Sparse GPU kernels for deep learningabstractScientific workloads have traditionally exploited high levels of sparsity to accelerate computation and reduce memory requirements. While deep neural networks can be made sparse, achieving practical speedups on GPUs is difficult because these applications have relatively moderate levels of sparsity that are not sufficient for existing sparse kernels to outperform their dense counterparts. In this work, we study sparse matrices from deep learning applications and identify favorable properties that can be exploited to accelerate computation. Based on these insights, we develop high-performance GPU kernels for two sparse matrix operations widely applicable in neural networks: sparse matrix-dense matrix multiplication and sampled dense- dense matrix multiplication. Our kernels reach 27% of singleprecision peak on Nvidia V100 GPUs. Using our kernels, we demonstrate sparse Transformer and MobileNet models that achieve 1.2-2.1× speedups and up to 12.8× memory savings without sacrificing accuracy. Trevor Gale, Matei Zaharia, Cliff Young, Erich Elsen |
SC | 1 |