EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Patton
dblp:190/7146 · also Brian J. Patton
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% 3D vision · 28% Generative modeling · 24% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene reconstruction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic Inference · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic Inference · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion model conditioning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic Inference · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
inverse rendering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic Inference · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic Inference · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Monte Carlo Learning for Time Series Structure Discovery · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Monte Carlo Learning for Time Series Structure Discovery · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Monte Carlo Learning for Time Series Structure Discovery · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
neural radiance field |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic Inference · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene priors |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic Inference · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
normalizing flow · 0.8neural radiance field · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8bayesian inference · 0.8sequential monte carlo · 0.7involutive MCMC · 0.7bayesian nonparametric prior · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic InferenceabstractHow do we infer a 3D scene from a single image in the presence of corruptions like rain, snow or fog? Straightforward domain randomization relies on knowing the family of corruptions ahead of time. Here, we propose a Bayesian approach—dubbed robust inverse graphics (RIG)—that relies on a strong scene prior and an uninformative uniform corruption prior, making it applicable to a wide range of corruptions. Given a single image, RIG performs posterior inference jointly over the scene and the corruption. We demonstrate this idea by training a neural radiance field (NeRF) scene prior and using a secondary NeRF to represent the corruptions over which we place an uninformative prior. RIG, trained only on clean data, outperforms depth estimators and alternative NeRF approaches that perform point estimation instead of full inference. The results hold for a number of scene prior architectures based on normalizing flows and diffusion models. For the latter, we develop reconstruction-guidance with auxiliary latents (ReGAL)—a diffusion conditioning algorithm that is applicable in the presence of auxiliary latent variables such as the corruption. RIG demonstrates how scene priors can be used beyond generation tasks. Pavel Sountsov, Matthew Hoffman 0001, Ben Lee, Brian Patton, Rif A. Saurous |
ICML | 5 |
| 2023 | Sequential Monte Carlo Learning for Time Series Structure DiscoveryabstractThis paper presents a new approach to automatically discovering accurate models of complex time series data. Working within a Bayesian nonparametric prior over a symbolic space of Gaussian process time series models, we present a novel structure learning algorithm that integrates sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) and involutive MCMC for highly effective posterior inference. Our method can be used both in "online” settings, where new data is incorporated sequentially in time, and in “offline” settings, by using nested subsets of historical data to anneal the posterior. Empirical measurements on real-world time series show that our method can deliver 10x–100x runtime speedups over previous MCMC and greedy-search structure learning algorithms targeting the same model family. We use our method to perform the first large-scale evaluation of Gaussian process time series structure learning on a prominent benchmark of 1,428 econometric datasets. The results show that our method discovers sensible models that deliver more accurate point forecasts and interval forecasts over multiple horizons as compared to widely used statistical and neural baselines that struggle on this challenging data. Feras Saad, Brian Patton, Matthew Hoffman 0001, Rif A. Saurous, Vikash Mansinghka 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | Differentiable Consistency Constraints for Improved Deep Speech EnhancementabstractIn recent years, deep networks have led to dramatic improvements in speech enhancement by framing it as a data-driven pattern recognition problem. In many modern enhancement systems, large amounts of data are used to train a deep network to estimate masks for complex-valued short-time Fourier transforms (STFTs) to suppress noise and preserve speech. However, current masking approaches often neglect two important constraints: STFT consistency and mixture consistency. Without STFT consistency, the system's output is not necessarily the STFT of a time-domain signal, and without mixture consistency, the sum of the estimated sources does not necessarily equal the input mixture. Furthermore, the only previous approaches that apply mixture consistency use real-valued masks; mixture consistency has been ignored for complex-valued masks. Scott Wisdom, John R. Hershey, Kevin W. Wilson, Jeremy Thorpe, Michael Chinen, Brian Patton, Rif A. Saurous |
ICASSP | 6 |