Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kirill Struminsky
dblp:190/7417
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 55% Optimization for machine learning · 22% Learning theory · 11% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
gumbel-max trick |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent structure discovery |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
discrete latent variable model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Deep Weight Prior · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Deep Weight Prior · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior modeling
weight prior |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Deep Weight Prior · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › probability calibration
calibration analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Quantifying Learning Guarantees for Convex but Inconsistent Surrogates · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function › surrogate loss
consistency of surrogate losses |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Quantifying Learning Guarantees for Convex but Inconsistent Surrogates · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function › surrogate loss
convex surrogate loss |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Quantifying Learning Guarantees for Convex but Inconsistent Surrogates · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient estimation
score function estimator |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
control variates · 0.9score function estimator · 0.5gumbel-max trick · 0.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.4black-box optimization · 0.4bayesian inference · 0.4convex surrogate analysis · 0.3calibration function lower bound · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CasTex: Cascaded Text-to-Texture Synthesis via Explicit Texture Maps and Physically-Based ShadingabstractThis work investigates text-to-texture synthesis using diffusion models to generate physically-based texture maps. We aim to achieve realistic model appearances under varying lighting conditions. A prominent solution for the task is score distillation sampling. It allows recovering a complex texture using gradient guidance given a differentiable rasterization and shading pipeline. However, in practice, the aforementioned solution in conjunction with the widespread latent diffusion models produces severe visual artifacts and requires additional regularization such as implicit texture parameterization. As a more direct alternative, we propose an approach using cascaded diffusion models for texture synthesis (CasTex). In our setup, score distillation sampling yields high-quality textures out-of-the box. In particular, we were able to omit implicit texture parameterization in favor of an explicit parameterization to improve the procedure. In the experiments, we show that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art optimization-based solutions on public texture synthesis benchmarks.Project page: https://thecrazymage.github.io/CasTex/. Mishan Aliev, Dmitry Baranchuk, Kirill Struminsky |
WACV | 3 |
| 2024 | Differentiable Rendering with Reparameterized Volume SamplingabstractIn view synthesis, a neural radiance field approximates underlying density and radiance fields based on a sparse set of scene pictures. To generate a pixel of a novel view, it marches a ray through the pixel and computes a weighted sum of radiance emitted from a dense set of ray points. This rendering algorithm is fully differentiable and facilitates gradient-based optimization of the fields. However, in practice, only a tiny opaque portion of the ray contributes most of the radiance to the sum. We propose a simple end-to-end differentiable sampling algorithm based on inverse transform sampling. It generates samples according to the probability distribution induced by the density field and picks non-transparent points on the ray. We utilize the algorithm in two ways. First, we propose a novel rendering approach based on Monte Carlo estimates. This approach allows for evaluating and optimizing a neural radiance field with just a few radiance field calls per ray. Second, we use the sampling algorithm to modify the hierarchical scheme proposed in the original NeRF work. We show that our modification improves reconstruction quality of hierarchical models, at the same time simplifying the training procedure by removing the need for auxiliary proposal network losses. Nikita Morozov, Denis Rakitin, Oleg Desheulin, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Kirill Struminsky |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2021 | Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial SpacesabstractStructured latent variables allow incorporating meaningful prior knowledge into deep learning models. However, learning with such variables remains challenging because of their discrete nature. Nowadays, the standard learning approach is to define a latent variable as a perturbed algorithm output and to use a differentiable surrogate for training. In general, the surrogate puts additional constraints on the model and inevitably leads to biased gradients. To alleviate these shortcomings, we extend the Gumbel-Max trick to define distributions over structured domains. We avoid the differentiable surrogates by leveraging the score function estimators for optimization. In particular, we highlight a family of recursive algorithms with a common feature we call stochastic invariant. The feature allows us to construct reliable gradient estimates and control variates without additional constraints on the model. In our experiments, we consider various structured latent variable models and achieve results competitive with relaxation-based counterparts. Kirill Struminsky, Artyom Gadetsky, Denis Rakitin, Danil Karpushkin, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce DistributionabstractLearning models with discrete latent variables using stochastic gradient descent remains a challenge due to the high variance of gradient estimates. Modern variance reduction techniques mostly consider categorical distributions and have limited applicability when the number of possible outcomes becomes large. In this work, we consider models with latent permutations and propose control variates for the Plackett-Luce distribution. In particular, the control variates allow us to optimize black-box functions over permutations using stochastic gradient descent. To illustrate the approach, we consider a variety of causal structure learning tasks for continuous and discrete data. We show that our method outperforms competitive relaxation-based optimization methods and is also applicable to non-differentiable score functions. Artyom Gadetsky, Kirill Struminsky, Christopher Robinson, Novi Quadrianto, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | The Deep Weight Prior
Andrei Atanov, Arsenii Ashukha, Kirill Struminsky, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Max Welling |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2018 | Quantifying Learning Guarantees for Convex but Inconsistent SurrogatesabstractWe study consistency properties of machine learning methods based on minimizing convex surrogates. We extend the recent framework of Osokin et al. (2017) for the quantitative analysis of consistency properties to the case of inconsistent surrogates. Our key technical contribution consists in a new lower bound on the calibration function for the quadratic surrogate, which is non-trivial (not always zero) for inconsistent cases. The new bound allows to quantify the level of inconsistency of the setting and shows how learning with inconsistent surrogates can have guarantees on sample complexity and optimization difficulty. We apply our theory to two concrete cases: multi-class classification with the tree-structured loss and ranking with the mean average precision loss. The results show the approximation-computation trade-offs caused by inconsistent surrogates and their potential benefits. Kirill Struminsky, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Anton Osokin |
NeurIPS | 1 |