Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abhinav Bommireddi

dblp:190/7449 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › property testing
adaptive vs non-adaptive testing
0.412020
Testing convexity of functions over finite domains · SODA 2020
Computational complexity › property testing
convexity testing
0.412020
Testing convexity of functions over finite domains · SODA 2020
Computational complexity
property testing
0.412020
Testing convexity of functions over finite domains · SODA 2020
Computational complexity
query complexity
0.412020
Testing convexity of functions over finite domains · SODA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tester construction · 0.4lower bound · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 On Testing and Robust Characterizations of Convexity
abstract
A body K ⊂ ℝⁿ is convex if and only if the line segment between any two points in K is completely contained within K or, equivalently, if and only if the convex hull of a set of points in K is contained within K. We show that neither of those characterizations of convexity are robust: there are bodies in ℝⁿ that are far from convex - in the sense that the volume of the symmetric difference between the set K and any convex set C is a constant fraction of the volume of K - for which a line segment between two randomly chosen points x,y ∈ K or the convex hull of a random set X of points in K is completely contained within K except with exponentially small probability. These results show that any algorithms for testing convexity based on the natural line segment and convex hull tests have exponential query complexity.
Eric Blais, Abhinav Bommireddi
APPROX-RANDOM2
2020 Testing convexity of functions over finite domains
abstract
We establish new upper and lower bounds on the number of queries required to test convexity of functions over various discrete domains. 1.We provide a simplified version of the non-adaptive convexity tester on the line. We re-prove the upper bound in the usual uniform model, and prove an upper bound in the distribution-free setting.2.We show a tight lower bound of queries for testing convexity of functions f: [n] → ℝ on the line. This lower bound applies to both adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms, and matches the upper bound from item 1, showing that adaptivity does not help in this setting.3.Moving to higher dimensions, we consider the case of a stripe [3] × [n]. We construct an adaptive tester for convexity of functions f: [3] × [n] → ℝ with query complexity O(log2 n). We also show that any non-adaptive tester must use queries in this setting. Thus, adaptivity yields an exponential improvement for this problem.4.For functions f: [n]d → ℝ over domains of dimension d ≥ 2, we show a non-adaptive query lower bound .
Aleksandrs Belovs, Eric Blais, Abhinav Bommireddi
SODA3
2017 Testing Submodularity and Other Properties of Valuation Functions
abstract
We show that for any constant \epsilon > 0 and p \ge 1, it is possible to distinguish functions f : \{0,1\}^n \to [0,1] that are submodular from those that are \epsilon-far from every submodular function in \ell_p distance with a constant number of queries. More generally, we extend the testing-by-implicit-learning framework of Diakonikolas et al.(2007) to show that every property of real-valued functions that is well-approximated in \ell_2 distance by a class of k-juntas for some k = O(1) can be tested in the \ell_p-testing model with a constant number of queries. This result, combined with a recent junta theorem of Feldman and \Vondrak (2016), yields the constant-query testability of submodularity. It also yields constant-query testing algorithms for a variety of other natural properties of valuation functions, including fractionally additive (XOS) functions, OXS functions, unit demand functions, coverage functions, and self-bounding functions.
Eric Blais, Abhinav Bommireddi
ITCS2