Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter J. Liu
dblp:190/7667
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 1 first-author · 8 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
17 papers |
Language models and text generation · 45% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% Trustworthy machine learning · 9% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 46, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
1.5 | 5 | 2020 | PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization · ICML 2020 MeanSum: A Neural Model for Unsupervised Multi-Document Abstractive Summarization · ICML 2019 Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequences · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
1.5 | 5 | 2020 | PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization · ICML 2020 MeanSum: A Neural Model for Unsupervised Multi-Document Abstractive Summarization · ICML 2019 Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequences · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Models · ICLR 2023 Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adam |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
hyperparameter transfer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network parameterization
maximal update parameterization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
training instability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilities · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
transformer training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilities · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
conditional language model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
conditional text generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generation · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
long-context language modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Investigating Efficiently Extending Transformers for Long Input Summarization · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
long document summarization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Investigating Efficiently Extending Transformers for Long Input Summarization · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SMART: Sentences as Basic Units for Text Evaluation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
sequence-to-sequence learning |
0.6 | 2 | 2017 | Online and Linear-Time Attention by Enforcing Monotonic Alignments · ICML 2017 Unsupervised Pretraining for Sequence to Sequence Learning · EMNLP 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
multi-task transfer learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › pre-training and adaptation
pre-training and fine-tuning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
transfer learning for NLP |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
fact extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated Text · KDD 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
multi-document summarization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MeanSum: A Neural Model for Unsupervised Multi-Document Abstractive Summarization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
unsupervised learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MeanSum: A Neural Model for Unsupervised Multi-Document Abstractive Summarization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Beyond Word Importance: Contextual Decomposition to Extract Interactions from LSTMs · ICLR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
language model interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Beyond Word Importance: Contextual Decomposition to Extract Interactions from LSTMs · ICLR 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
monotonic attention |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Online and Linear-Time Attention by Enforcing Monotonic Alignments · ICML 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Unsupervised Pretraining for Sequence to Sequence Learning · EMNLP 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence likelihood calibration · 1.4weight decay · 0.8warm-up · 0.8rejection sampling · 0.8muparam · 0.8direct preference optimization · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.7out-of-distribution detection · 0.7long-sequence pretraining · 0.7block-local attention · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-RankabstractTianqi Liu, Zhen Qin, Junru Wu, Jiaming Shen, Misha Khalman, Rishabh Joshi, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Simon Baumgartner, Jialu Liu, Peter J Liu, Xuanhui Wang. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Tianqi Liu 0002, Zhen Qin 0001, Misha Khalman, Rishabh Joshi, Mohammad Saleh, Simon Baumgartner, Peter J. Liu, Xuanhui Wang |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 11 |
| 2024 | Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference OptimizationabstractImproving the alignment of language models with human preferences remains an active research challenge. Previous approaches have primarily utilized online Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Recently, offline methods such as Sequence Likelihood Calibration (SLiC) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have emerged as attractive alternatives, offering improvements in stability and scalability while maintaining competitive performance. SLiC refines its loss function using sequence pairs sampled from a supervised fine-tuned (SFT) policy, while DPO directly optimizes language models based on preference data, foregoing the need for a separate reward model. However, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the target optimal policy requires labeled preference pairs sampled from that policy. The absence of a reward model in DPO constrains its ability to sample preference pairs from the optimal policy. Meanwhile, SLiC can only sample preference pairs from the SFT policy. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel approach called Statistical Rejection Sampling Optimization (RSO) designed to source preference data from the target optimal policy using rejection sampling, enabling a more accurate estimation of the optimal policy. We also propose a unified framework that enhances the loss functions used in both SLiC and DPO from a preference modeling standpoint. Through extensive experiments across diverse tasks, we demonstrate that RSO consistently outperforms both SLiC and DPO as evaluated by both Large Language Models (LLMs) and human raters. Tianqi Liu 0002, Rishabh Joshi, Misha Khalman, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. Liu |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2024 | Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiesabstractTeams that have trained large Transformer-based models have reported training instabilities at large scale that did not appear when training with the same hyperparameters at smaller scales. Although the causes of such instabilities are of scientific interest, the amount of resources required to reproduce them has made investigation difficult. In this work, we seek ways to reproduce and study training instability at smaller scales. First, we focus on two sources of training instability described in previous work: the growth of logits in attention layers (Dehghani et al., 2023) and divergence of the output logits from the log probabilities (Chowdhery et al., 2022). By measuring the relationship between learning rate and loss across scales, we show that these instabilities also appear in small models when training at high learning rates, and that mitigations previously employed at large scales are equally effective in this regime. This prompts us to investigate the extent to which other known optimizer and model interventions influence the sensitivity of the final loss to changes in the learning rate. To this end, we study methods such as warm-up, weight decay, and the MuParam (Yang et al., 2022), and combine techniques to train small models that achieve similar losses across orders of magnitude of learning rate variation. Finally, to conclude our exploration we study two cases where instabilities can be predicted before they emerge by examining the scaling behavior of model characteristics such as activation and gradient norms. Mitchell Wortsman, Peter J. Liu, Lechao Xiao, Katie Everett, Alexander A. Alemi, Ben Adlam, John D. Co-Reyes, Izzeddin Gur, Roman Novak, Jeffrey Pennington, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Kelvin Xu, Jaehoon Lee 0001, Justin Gilmer, Simon Kornblith |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and OptimizersabstractRobust and effective scaling of models from small to large width typically requires the precise adjustment of many algorithmic and architectural details, such as parameterization and optimizer choices. In this work, we propose a new perspective on parameterization by investigating a key assumption in prior work about the alignment between parameters and data and derive new theoretical results under weaker assumptions and a broader set of optimizers. Our extensive empirical investigation includes *tens of thousands* of models trained with *all combinations of* three optimizers, four parameterizations, several alignment assumptions, more than a dozen learning rates, and fourteen model sizes up to 27B parameters. We find that the best learning rate scaling prescription would often have been excluded by the assumptions in prior work. Our results show that all parameterizations, not just maximal update parameterization (muP), can achieve hyperparameter transfer; moreover, our novel per-layer learning rate prescription for standard parameterization outperforms muP. Finally, we demonstrate that an overlooked aspect of parameterization, the epsilon parameter in Adam, must be scaled correctly to avoid gradient underflow and propose *Adam-atan2*, a new numerically stable, scale-invariant version of Adam that eliminates the epsilon hyperparameter entirely. Katie Everett, Lechao Xiao, Mitchell Wortsman, Alexander A. Alemi, Roman Novak, Peter J. Liu, Izzeddin Gur, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Jaehoon Lee 0001, Jeffrey Pennington |
ICML | 6 |
| 2023 | Investigating Efficiently Extending Transformers for Long Input SummarizationabstractWhile large pretrained Transformer models have proven highly capable at tackling natural language tasks, handling long sequence inputs still poses a significant challenge.One such task is long input summarization, where inputs are longer than the maximum input context of most models.Through an extensive set of experiments, we investigate what model architectural changes and pretraining paradigms most efficiently adapt a pretrained Transformer for long input summarization.We find that a staggered, block-local Transformer with global encoder tokens strikes a good balance of performance and efficiency, and that an additional pretraining phase on long sequences meaningfully improves downstream summarization performance.Based on our findings, we introduce PEGASUS-X, an extension of the PE-GASUS model with additional long input pretraining to handle inputs of up to 16K tokens, which achieves strong performance on long input summarization tasks comparable with much larger models. Jason Phang, Peter J. Liu |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2023 | Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Models
Jie Ren 0006, Jiaming Luo, Kundan Krishna, Mohammad Saleh, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Peter J. Liu |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2023 | SMART: Sentences as Basic Units for Text Evaluation
Reinald Kim Amplayo, Peter J. Liu, Shashi Narayan |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generation
Misha Khalman, Rishabh Joshi, Shashi Narayan, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. Liu |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2020 | PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationabstractRecent work pre-training Transformers with self-supervised objectives on large text corpora has shown great success when fine-tuned on downstream NLP tasks including text summarization. However, pre-training objectives tailored for abstractive text summarization have not been explored. Furthermore there is a lack of systematic evaluation across diverse domains. In this work, we propose pre-training large Transformer-based encoder-decoder models on massive text corpora with a new self-supervised objective. In PEGASUS, important sentences are removed/masked from an input document and are generated together as one output sequence from the remaining sentences, similar to an extractive summary. We evaluated our best PEGASUS model on 12 downstream summarization tasks spanning news, science, stories, instructions, emails, patents, and legislative bills. Experiments demonstrate it achieves state-of-the-art performance on all 12 downstream datasets measured by ROUGE scores. Our model also shows surprising performance on low-resource summarization, surpassing previous state-of-the-art results on 6 datasets with only 1000 examples. Finally we validated our results using human evaluation and show that our model summaries achieve human performance on multiple datasets. Jingqing Zhang, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. Liu |
ICML | 4 |
| 2020 | Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text TransformerabstractTransfer learning, where a model is first pre-trained on a data-rich task before being fine-tuned on a downstream task, has emerged as a powerful technique in natural language processing (NLP). The effectiveness of transfer learning has given rise to a diversity of approaches, methodology, and practice. In this paper, we explore the landscape of transfer learning techniques for NLP by introducing a unified framework that converts all text-based language problems into a text-to-text format. Our systematic study compares pre-training objectives, architectures, unlabeled data sets, transfer approaches, and other factors on dozens of language understanding tasks. By combining the insights from our exploration with scale and our new “Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus”, we achieve state-of-the-art results on many benchmarks covering summarization, question answering, text classification, and more. To facilitate future work on transfer learning for NLP, we release our data set, pre-trained models, and code. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li 0133, Peter J. Liu |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 9 |
| 2019 | MeanSum: A Neural Model for Unsupervised Multi-Document Abstractive SummarizationabstractAbstractive summarization has been studied using neural sequence transduction methods with datasets of large, paired document-summary examples. However, such datasets are rare and the models trained from them do not generalize to other domains. Recently, some progress has been made in learning sequence-to-sequence mappings with only unpaired examples. In our work, we consider the setting where there are only documents (product or business reviews) with no summaries provided, and propose an end-to-end, neural model architecture to perform unsupervised abstractive summarization. Our proposed model consists of an auto-encoder where the mean of the representations of the input reviews decodes to a reasonable summary-review. We consider variants of the proposed architecture and perform an ablation study to show the importance of specific components. We show through metrics and human evaluation that the generated summaries are highly abstractive, fluent, relevant, and representative of the average sentiment of the input reviews. Finally, we collect a ground-truth evaluation dataset and show that our model outperforms a strong extractive baseline. Eric Chu, Peter J. Liu |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated TextabstractWe propose a model-based metric to estimate the factual accuracy of generated text that is complementary to typical scoring schemes like ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) and BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy). We introduce and release a new large-scale dataset based on Wikipedia and Wikidata to train relation classifiers and end-to-end fact extraction models. The end-to-end models are shown to be able to extract complete sets of facts from datasets with full pages of text. We then analyse multiple models that estimate factual accuracy on a Wikipedia text summarization task, and show their efficacy compared to ROUGE and other model-free variants by conducting a human evaluation study. Ben Goodrich, Vinay Rao, Peter J. Liu, Mohammad Saleh |
KDD | 3 |
| 2019 | Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution DetectionabstractDiscriminative neural networks offer little or no performance guarantees when deployed on data not generated by the same process as the training distribution. On such out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs, the prediction may not only be erroneous, but confidently so, limiting the safe deployment of classifiers in real-world applications. One such challenging application is bacteria identification based on genomic sequences, which holds the promise of early detection of diseases, but requires a model that can output low confidence predictions on OOD genomic sequences from new bacteria that were not present in the training data. We introduce a genomics dataset for OOD detection that allows other researchers to benchmark progress on this important problem. We investigate deep generative model based approaches for OOD detection and observe that the likelihood score is heavily affected by population level background statistics. We propose a likelihood ratio method for deep generative models which effectively corrects for these confounding background statistics. We benchmark the OOD detection performance of the proposed method against existing approaches on the genomics dataset and show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance. Finally, we demonstrate the generality of the proposed method by showing that it significantly improves OOD detection when applied to deep generative models of images. Jie Ren 0006, Peter J. Liu, Emily Fertig, Jasper Snoek, Ryan Poplin, Mark A. DePristo, Joshua V. Dillon, Balaji Lakshminarayanan |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequences
Peter J. Liu, Mohammad Saleh, Etienne Pot, Ben Goodrich, Ryan Sepassi, Lukasz Kaiser, Noam Shazeer |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Beyond Word Importance: Contextual Decomposition to Extract Interactions from LSTMs
W. James Murdoch, Peter J. Liu, Bin Yu 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2017 | Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator NetworksabstractNeural sequence-to-sequence models have provided a viable new approach for abstractive text summarization (meaning they are not restricted to simply selecting and rearranging passages from the original text).However, these models have two shortcomings: they are liable to reproduce factual details inaccurately, and they tend to repeat themselves.In this work we propose a novel architecture that augments the standard sequence-to-sequence attentional model in two orthogonal ways.First, we use a hybrid pointer-generator network that can copy words from the source text via pointing, which aids accurate reproduction of information, while retaining the ability to produce novel words through the generator.Second, we use coverage to keep track of what has been summarized, which discourages repetition.We apply our model to the CNN / Daily Mail summarization task, outperforming the current abstractive state-of-the-art by at least 2 ROUGE points. Abigail See, Peter J. Liu, Christopher D. Manning |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2017 | Unsupervised Pretraining for Sequence to Sequence LearningabstractThis work presents a general unsupervised learning method to improve the accuracy of sequence to sequence (seq2seq) models.In our method, the weights of the encoder and decoder of a seq2seq model are initialized with the pretrained weights of two language models and then fine-tuned with labeled data.We apply this method to challenging benchmarks in machine translation and abstractive summarization and find that it significantly improves the subsequent supervised models.Our main result is that pretraining improves the generalization of seq2seq models.We achieve state-of-theart results on the WMT English→German task, surpassing a range of methods using both phrase-based machine translation and neural machine translation.Our method achieves a significant improvement of 1.3 BLEU from the previous best models on both WMT'14 and WMT'15 English→German.We also conduct human evaluations on abstractive summarization and find that our method outperforms a purely supervised learning baseline in a statistically significant manner. Prajit Ramachandran, Peter J. Liu, Quoc V. Le |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2017 | Online and Linear-Time Attention by Enforcing Monotonic AlignmentsabstractRecurrent neural network models with an attention mechanism have proven to be extremely effective on a wide variety of sequence-to-sequence problems. However, the fact that soft attention mechanisms perform a pass over the entire input sequence when producing each element in the output sequence precludes their use in online settings and results in a quadratic time complexity. Based on the insight that the alignment between input and output sequence elements is monotonic in many problems of interest, we propose an end-to-end differentiable method for learning monotonic alignments which, at test time, enables computing attention online and in linear time. We validate our approach on sentence summarization, machine translation, and online speech recognition problems and achieve results competitive with existing sequence-to-sequence models. Colin Raffel, Minh-Thang Luong, Peter J. Liu, Ron J. Weiss, Douglas Eck |
ICML | 3 |