Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Enis Ulqinaku
dblp:190/7677
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Network security · 41% Hardware security and side channels · 36% Usable security · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security › protocol security
downgrade attack |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Is Real-time Phishing Eliminated with FIDO? Social Engineering Downgrade Attacks against FIDO Protocols · USENIX Security Symposium 2021 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ProtectIOn: Root-of-Trust for IO in Compromised Platforms · NDSS 2020 |
Usable security
social engineering |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Is Real-time Phishing Eliminated with FIDO? Social Engineering Downgrade Attacks against FIDO Protocols · USENIX Security Symposium 2021 |
Systems and software security
platform security |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | ProtectIOn: Root-of-Trust for IO in Compromised Platforms · NDSS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
protocol analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Is Real-time Phishing Eliminated with FIDO? Social Engineering Downgrade Attacks against FIDO Protocols
Enis Ulqinaku, Hala Assal, AbdelRahman Abdou, Sonia Chiasson, Srdjan Capkun |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2020 | ProtectIOn: Root-of-Trust for IO in Compromised Platforms
Aritra Dhar, Enis Ulqinaku, Kari Kostiainen, Srdjan Capkun |
NDSS | 2 |
| 2019 | 2FA-PP: 2nd factor phishing preventionabstractTwo factor authentication (2FA) schemes provide strong user authentication guarantees and increase the security of a wide range of web services. However, 2FA schemes still largely remain vulnerable to phishing attacks in which attackers also phish users' second factor (e.g., their OTP tokens). We propose 2FA-PP, a phishing detection scheme that protects users' 2nd authentication factor from phishing attacks. 2FA-PP uses novel browser APIs that support direct communication between browsers and external devices (e.g., mobile phones) and enables the user's phone to check the domain to which the user is connected. The second factor is then only made available to the user if he is accessing the correct domain. 2FA-PP can be combined with different 2FA schemes, both interactive, based on OTP, QR codes and non-interactive, based on device pairing or proximity. Enis Ulqinaku, Daniele Lain, Srdjan Capkun |
WiSec | 1 |
| 2017 | Using hover to compromise the confidentiality of user input on AndroidabstractWe show that the new hover (floating touch) technology, available in a number of today's smartphone models, can be abused by malicious Android applications to record all touchscreen input into applications system-wide. Leveraging this attack, a malicious application running on the system is able to capture sensitive input such as passwords and PINs, record all user's social interactions, as well as profile user's behavior. To evaluate our attack we implemented Hoover, a proof-of-concept malicious application that runs in the background and records all input to all foreground applications. We evaluated Hoover with 20 users, across two different Android devices and two input methods, stylus and finger. In the case of touchscreen input by finger, Hoover estimated the positions of users' clicks within an error of 100 pixels and keyboard input with an accuracy of 79%. Hoover captured users' input by stylus even more accurately, estimating users' clicks within 2 pixels and keyboard input with an accuracy of 98%. Differently from existing well-known side channel attacks, this is the first work that proves the security implications of the hover technology and its potential to steal all user inputs with high granularity. We discuss ways of mitigating this attack and show that this cannot be done by simply restricting access to permissions or imposing additional cognitive load on the users since this would significantly constrain the intended use of the hover technology. Enis Ulqinaku, Luka Malisa, Julinda Stefa, Alessandro Mei, Srdjan Capkun |
WISEC | 1 |