Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Enis Ulqinaku

dblp:190/7677 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Network security · 41% Hardware security and side channels · 36% Usable security · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › protocol security
downgrade attack
0.512021
Is Real-time Phishing Eliminated with FIDO? Social Engineering Downgrade Attacks against FIDO Protocols · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.412020
ProtectIOn: Root-of-Trust for IO in Compromised Platforms · NDSS 2020
Usable security
social engineering
0.112021
Is Real-time Phishing Eliminated with FIDO? Social Engineering Downgrade Attacks against FIDO Protocols · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
Systems and software security
platform security
0.112020
ProtectIOn: Root-of-Trust for IO in Compromised Platforms · NDSS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

protocol analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Is Real-time Phishing Eliminated with FIDO? Social Engineering Downgrade Attacks against FIDO Protocols
Enis Ulqinaku, Hala Assal, AbdelRahman Abdou, Sonia Chiasson, Srdjan Capkun
USENIX Security Symposium1
2020 ProtectIOn: Root-of-Trust for IO in Compromised Platforms
Aritra Dhar, Enis Ulqinaku, Kari Kostiainen, Srdjan Capkun
NDSS2
2019 2FA-PP: 2nd factor phishing prevention
abstract
Two factor authentication (2FA) schemes provide strong user authentication guarantees and increase the security of a wide range of web services. However, 2FA schemes still largely remain vulnerable to phishing attacks in which attackers also phish users' second factor (e.g., their OTP tokens). We propose 2FA-PP, a phishing detection scheme that protects users' 2nd authentication factor from phishing attacks. 2FA-PP uses novel browser APIs that support direct communication between browsers and external devices (e.g., mobile phones) and enables the user's phone to check the domain to which the user is connected. The second factor is then only made available to the user if he is accessing the correct domain. 2FA-PP can be combined with different 2FA schemes, both interactive, based on OTP, QR codes and non-interactive, based on device pairing or proximity.
Enis Ulqinaku, Daniele Lain, Srdjan Capkun
WiSec1
2017 Using hover to compromise the confidentiality of user input on Android
abstract
We show that the new hover (floating touch) technology, available in a number of today's smartphone models, can be abused by malicious Android applications to record all touchscreen input into applications system-wide. Leveraging this attack, a malicious application running on the system is able to capture sensitive input such as passwords and PINs, record all user's social interactions, as well as profile user's behavior. To evaluate our attack we implemented Hoover, a proof-of-concept malicious application that runs in the background and records all input to all foreground applications. We evaluated Hoover with 20 users, across two different Android devices and two input methods, stylus and finger. In the case of touchscreen input by finger, Hoover estimated the positions of users' clicks within an error of 100 pixels and keyboard input with an accuracy of 79%. Hoover captured users' input by stylus even more accurately, estimating users' clicks within 2 pixels and keyboard input with an accuracy of 98%. Differently from existing well-known side channel attacks, this is the first work that proves the security implications of the hover technology and its potential to steal all user inputs with high granularity. We discuss ways of mitigating this attack and show that this cannot be done by simply restricting access to permissions or imposing additional cognitive load on the users since this would significantly constrain the intended use of the hover technology.
Enis Ulqinaku, Luka Malisa, Julinda Stefa, Alessandro Mei, Srdjan Capkun
WISEC1