Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edward Banner

dblp:190/7759 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.312018
Learning Disentangled Representations of Texts with Application to Biomedical Abstracts · EMNLP 2018
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search › entity retrieval
attribute-based retrieval
0.312018
Learning Disentangled Representations of Texts with Application to Biomedical Abstracts · EMNLP 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

triplet objective · 0.7adversarial training · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Learning Disentangled Representations of Texts with Application to Biomedical Abstracts
abstract
We propose a method for learning disentangled representations of texts that code for distinct and complementary aspects, with the aim of affording efficient model transfer and interpretability.To induce disentangled embeddings, we propose an adversarial objective based on the (dis)similarity between triplets of documents with respect to specific aspects.Our motivating application is embedding biomedical abstracts describing clinical trials in a manner that disentangles the populations, interventions, and outcomes in a given trial.We show that our method learns representations that encode these clinically salient aspects, and that these can be effectively used to perform aspect-specific retrieval.We demonstrate that the approach generalizes beyond our motivating application in experiments on two multi-aspect review corpora.
Edward Banner, Jan-Willem van de Meent, Iain James Marshall, Byron C. Wallace
EMNLP2
2018 Neural information retrieval: at the end of the early years
abstract
A recent “third wave” of neural network (NN) approaches now delivers state-of-the-art performance in many machine learning tasks, spanning speech recognition, computer vision, and natural language processing. Because these modern NNs often comprise multiple interconnected layers, work in this area is often referred to as deep learning . Recent years have witnessed an explosive growth of research into NN-based approaches to information retrieval (IR). A significant body of work has now been created. In this paper, we survey the current landscape of Neural IR research, paying special attention to the use of learned distributed representations of textual units. We highlight the successes of neural IR thus far, catalog obstacles to its wider adoption, and suggest potentially promising directions for future research.
Kezban Dilek Onal, Ismail Sengör Altingövde, Pinar Karagöz, Alexander Braylan, Brandon Dang, Heng-Lu Chang, Henna Kim, Quinten McNamara, Aaron Angert, Edward Banner, Vivek Khetan, Tyler McDonnell, An T. Nguyen 0001, Byron C. Wallace, Maarten de Rijke, Matthew Lease
Inf. Retr. J.12