Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick L. Anderson

dblp:190/8434 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-4317-8338ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 61% Motion planning and robot control · 39%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › continuum robot
continuum robot modeling
0.412020
A Dynamic Model for Concentric Tube Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2020
Robotics › Robot manipulation › continuum robot
cosserat rod model
0.412020
A Dynamic Model for Concentric Tube Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
design optimization
0.312018
Kinematic Design Optimization of a Parallel Surgical Robot to Maximize Anatomical Visibility via Motion Planning · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
kinodynamic planning
0.312018
Kinematic Design Optimization of a Parallel Surgical Robot to Maximize Anatomical Visibility via Motion Planning · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics › surgical robotics
minimally invasive surgery
0.312018
Kinematic Design Optimization of a Parallel Surgical Robot to Maximize Anatomical Visibility via Motion Planning · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.312018
Kinematic Design Optimization of a Parallel Surgical Robot to Maximize Anatomical Visibility via Motion Planning · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics
surgical robotics
0.312018
Kinematic Design Optimization of a Parallel Surgical Robot to Maximize Anatomical Visibility via Motion Planning · ICRA 2018
Mathematical optimization
global optimization
0.112018
Kinematic Design Optimization of a Parallel Surgical Robot to Maximize Anatomical Visibility via Motion Planning · ICRA 2018
Mathematical optimization › metaheuristic optimization
simulated annealing
0.112018
Kinematic Design Optimization of a Parallel Surgical Robot to Maximize Anatomical Visibility via Motion Planning · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

collision checking · 0.7adaptive simulated annealing · 0.7partial differential equations · 0.4implicit finite differences · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 A Dynamic Model for Concentric Tube Robots
abstract
Existing static and kinematic models of concentric tube robots are based on the ordinary differential equations of a static Cosserat rod. In this paper, we provide the first dynamic model for concentric tube continuum robots by adapting the partial differential equations of a dynamic Cosserat rod to describe the coupled inertial dynamics of precurved concentric tubes. This generates an initial-boundary-value problem that can capture robot vibrations over time. We solve this model numerically at high time resolutions using implicit finite differences in time and arc length. This approach is capable of resolving the high-frequency torsional dynamics that occur during unstable "snapping" motions and provides a simulation tool that can track the true robot configuration through such transitions. Further, it can track slower oscillations associated with bending and torsion as a robot interacts with tissue at real-time speeds. Experimental verification of the model shows that this wide range of effects is captured efficiently and accurately.
John Till, Vincent A. Aloi, Katherine E. Riojas, Patrick L. Anderson, Robert J. Webster III, D. Caleb Rucker
IEEE Trans. Robotics4
2018 Kinematic Design Optimization of a Parallel Surgical Robot to Maximize Anatomical Visibility via Motion Planning
abstract
We introduce a method to optimize on a patient-specific basis the kinematic design of the Continuum Reconfigurable Incisionless Surgical Parallel (CRISP) robot, a needle-diameter medical robot based on a parallel structure that is capable of performing minimally invasive procedures. Our objective is to maximize the ability of the robot's tip camera to view tissue surfaces in constrained spaces. The kinematic design of the CRISP robot, which greatly influences its ability to perform a task, includes parameters that are fixed before the procedure begins, such as entry points into the body and parallel structure connection points. We combine a global stochastic optimization algorithm, Adaptive Simulated Annealing (ASA), with a motion planner designed specifically for the CRISP robot. ASA facilitates exploration of the robot's design space while the motion planner enables evaluation of candidate designs based on their ability to successfully view target regions on a tissue surface. By leveraging motion planning, we ensure that the evaluation of a design only considers motions which do not collide with the patient's anatomy. We analytically show that the method asymptotically converges to a globally optimal solution and demonstrate our algorithm's ability to optimize kinematic designs of the CRISP robot on a patient-specific basis.
Alan Kuntz, Chris Bowen, Cenk Baykal, Arthur W. Mahoney, Patrick L. Anderson, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J. Webster III, Ron Alterovitz
ICRA5
2017 Motion planning for continuum reconfigurable incisionless surgical parallel robots
abstract
Continuum Reconfigurable Incisionless Surgical Parallel (CRISP) robots consist of multiple needle-diameter flexible instruments that are assembled into a parallel structure inside the human body. With a camera placed at the tip of one of the instruments, the CRISP robot can be used to inspect anatomical sites in constrained body cavities in a minimally invasive manner. We introduce a motion planner for CRISP robots that computes manipulations of the flexible instruments outside the body such that the camera can visually inspect a user-specified site of clinical interest inside the body. Our sampling-based motion planner ensures avoidance of collisions with anatomical obstacles inside the body, enforces remote-center-of-motion constraints on the instrument's entry points into the body, and efficiently handles the expensive computation of CRISP robot kinematics. We also extend the motion planner to estimate the set of points inside a body cavity that can be visually inspected by the camera of a CRISP robot for a given setup. We demonstrate our method in a simulated endoscopic medical procedure in the pleural space around a lung.
Alan Kuntz, Arthur W. Mahoney, Nicolas E. Peckman, Patrick L. Anderson, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J. Webster III, Ron Alterovitz
IROS4
2016 Reconfigurable parallel continuum robots for incisionless surgery
abstract
We propose a new class of robotic device for minimally-invasive surgery that lies at the intersection of continuum, parallel, and reconfigurable robotics. This Continuum Reconfigurable Incisionless Surgical Parallel (CRISP) paradigm involves the use of multiple needle-diameter devices inserted through the skin and assembled into parallel structures inside the body. The parallel structure can be reconfigured inside the patient's body to satisfy changing task requirements such as reaching initially inaccessible locations or modifying mechanical stiffness for manipulation or palpation. Another potential advantage of the CRISP concept is that many small (needle-sized) entry points into the patient may be preferable in terms of both patient healing and cosmesis to the single (or multiple) larger ports needed to admit current surgical robots. This paper presents a mechanics-based model for CRISP forward and inverse kinematics, along with experimental validation.
Arthur W. Mahoney, Patrick L. Anderson, Philip J. Swaney, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J. Webster III
IROS2