Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jemma L. Geoghegan

dblp:191/0063 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-0970-0153ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
evolutionary rate estimation
0.212016
Estimating evolutionary rates using time-structured data: a general comparison of phylogenetic methods · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
molecular clock
0.212016
Estimating evolutionary rates using time-structured data: a general comparison of phylogenetic methods · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.212016
Estimating evolutionary rates using time-structured data: a general comparison of phylogenetic methods · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

root-to-tip regression · 0.2least-squares dating · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Estimating evolutionary rates using time-structured data: a general comparison of phylogenetic methods
abstract
MOTIVATION: In rapidly evolving pathogens, including viruses and some bacteria, genetic change can accumulate over short time-frames. Accordingly, their sampling times can be used to calibrate molecular clocks, allowing estimation of evolutionary rates. Methods for estimating rates from time-structured data vary in how they treat phylogenetic uncertainty and rate variation among lineages. We compiled 81 virus data sets and estimated nucleotide substitution rates using root-to-tip regression, least-squares dating and Bayesian inference. RESULTS: Although estimates from these three methods were often congruent, this largely relied on the choice of clock model. In particular, relaxed-clock models tended to produce higher rate estimates than methods that assume constant rates. Discrepancies in rate estimates were also associated with high among-lineage rate variation, and phylogenetic and temporal clustering. These results provide insights into the factors that affect the reliability of rate estimates from time-structured sequence data, emphasizing the importance of clock-model testing. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Sebastián Duchêne, Jemma L. Geoghegan, Edward C. Holmes, Simon Y. W. Ho
Bioinform.2