Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haoxi Li
dblp:191/2462
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large reasoning model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Think How to Think: Mitigating Overthinking with Autonomous Difficulty Cognition in Large Reasoning Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning › efficient reasoning
overthinking mitigation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Think How to Think: Mitigating Overthinking with Autonomous Difficulty Cognition in Large Reasoning Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
causal analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causally Motivated Sycophancy Mitigation for Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › structured pruning
expert pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DiEP: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts Compression through Differentiable Expert Pruning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causally Motivated Sycophancy Mitigation for Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DiEP: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts Compression through Differentiable Expert Pruning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DiEP: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts Compression through Differentiable Expert Pruning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DiEP: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts Compression through Differentiable Expert Pruning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
sycophancy mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causally Motivated Sycophancy Mitigation for Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Age-Related Factor Guided Joint Task Modeling Convolutional Neural Network for Cross-Age Face Recognition · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 Comments on "Iterative Re-Constrained Group Sparse Face Recognition With Adaptive Weights Learning" · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2017 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition › robust face recognition
age-invariant face recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Age-Related Factor Guided Joint Task Modeling Convolutional Neural Network for Cross-Age Face Recognition · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Age-Related Factor Guided Joint Task Modeling Convolutional Neural Network for Cross-Age Face Recognition · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Think How to Think: Mitigating Overthinking with Autonomous Difficulty Cognition in Large Reasoning Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Comments on "Iterative Re-Constrained Group Sparse Face Recognition With Adaptive Weights Learning" · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › DNN pruning
differentiable pruning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | DiEP: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts Compression through Differentiable Expert Pruning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial age estimation
age estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Age-Related Factor Guided Joint Task Modeling Convolutional Neural Network for Cross-Age Face Recognition · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
facial attribute analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Age-Related Factor Guided Joint Task Modeling Convolutional Neural Network for Cross-Age Face Recognition · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-stage fine-tuning · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0difficulty cognition · 1.0structured causal model · 0.9representation calibration · 0.9gradient-based pruning · 0.9differentiable expert pruning · 0.9causal head reweighting · 0.9convolutional neural network · 0.3alternative training · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Think How to Think: Mitigating Overthinking with Autonomous Difficulty Cognition in Large Reasoning ModelsabstractRecent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex reasoning tasks but often suffer from overthinking, generating overly long and redundant reasoning trajectories.To explore its essence, our empirical analysis reveals that LRMs are primarily limited to recognizing task properties (i.e., difficulty levels) like humans before solving the problem, leading to a one-size-fits-all reasoning strategy.This observation motivates a fundamental question: Can we explicitly bootstrap such ability to alleviate overthinking in LRMs?To this end, we propose Think-How-to-Think (TH2T), a novel two-stage fine-tuning strategy that progressively inspires LRMs' difficulty cognition and redundancy cognition of LRMs.Specifically, we first inject Difficulty Dypnosis into output prefixes as cues for global, prospective reasoning strategy selection, stimulating the model's sharper sensitivity to task complexity and adaptive control of reasoning depth.Then, we incorporate Redundancy Hypnosis into inprogress reasoning steps, which serve as local, retrospective signals for behavior correction by identifying and eliminating superfluous reasoning detours.Experiments across 7B/14B/32B models demonstrate that TH2T significantly reduces inference costs by over 70% on easy tasks and 40% on complex ones without compromising performance.The resultant models exhibit a nascent ability for difficulty-aware reasoning, effectively mitigating behaviors like excessive reflection and looping, thereby paving the way for more cognitively efficient LRMs. Yongjiang Liu, Haoxi Li, Xiaosong Ma, Jie Zhang 0076, Song Guo 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Causally Motivated Sycophancy Mitigation for Large Language ModelsabstractIncorporating user preferences into large language models (LLMs) can enhance the personalization and reliability of model outputs and facilitate the application of LLMs to real-world scenarios. However, leveraging user preferences can be a double-edged sword. Recent studies have found that improper utilization can incur sycophancy, where LLMs prioritize alignment with user preferences over the correctness of their outputs. To address sycophancy in LLMs, we analyze and model the problem through the lens of structured causal models (SCMs). We attribute sycophancy to LLMs' reliance on spurious correlations between user preferences and model outputs in this paper. Based on the proposed SCMs, we develop a novel framework, termed **CAUSM**, to mitigate sycophancy in LLMs by exploiting a significant causal signature. Specifically, we eliminate the spurious correlations embedded in the intermediate layers of LLMs through causally motivated head reweighting, and then calibrate the intra-head knowledge along the causal representation direction. Extensive experiments are conducted across diverse language tasks to demonstrate the superiority of our method over state-of-the-art competitors in mitigating sycophancy in LLMs. Haoxi Li, Xueyang Tang, Jie Zhang 0076, Song Guo 0001, Sikai Bai, Peiran Dong, Yue Yu 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | DiEP: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts Compression through Differentiable Expert PruningabstractDespite the significant breakthrough of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), the increasing scale of these MoE models presents huge memory and storage challenges. Existing MoE pruning methods, which involve reducing parameter size with a uniform sparsity across all layers, often lead to suboptimal outcomes and performance degradation due to varying expert redundancy in different MoE layers. To address this, we propose a non-uniform pruning strategy, dubbed Differentiable Expert Pruning (DiEP), which adaptively adjusts pruning rates at the layer level while jointly learning inter-layer importance, effectively capturing the varying redundancy across different MoE layers. By transforming the global discrete search space into a continuous one, our method handles exponentially growing non-uniform expert combinations, enabling adaptive gradient-based pruning. Extensive experiments on five advanced MoE models demonstrate the efficacy of our method across various NLP tasks. Notably, \textbf{DiEP} retains around 92\% of original performance on Mixtral 8$\times$7B with only half the experts, outperforming other pruning methods by up to 7.1% on the challenging MMLU dataset. Sikai Bai, Haoxi Li, Jie Zhang 0076, Zicong Hong, Song Guo 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2019 | Age-Invariant Face Recognition Using Coupled Similarity Reference Coding
Yongbo Wu, Haifeng Hu 0001, Haoxi Li |
Neural Process. Lett. | 3 |
| 2018 | Age-Related Factor Guided Joint Task Modeling Convolutional Neural Network for Cross-Age Face RecognitionabstractCross-age face recognition has remained a popular research topic as most regular facial recognition systems have failed in dealing with facial changes through age. In order to enhance the system's capability of discriminating facial identity features in spite of age changes, this paper proposes a novel deep convolutional network method for cross-age face recognition called age-related factor guided joint task modeling convolutional neural networks, which combines an identity discrimination network with an age discrimination network that shares the same feature layers. By alternatively training the fusion networks and the combined factor model, the cross-age identity features and cross-identity age features can be effectively separated with high inter-class distension and intra-class compactness. Extensive experiments have been performed on the benchmark aging data sets, including MORPH, CACD-VS, and Cross Age LFW. The results have demonstrated the superiority and effectiveness of our model. Haoxi Li, Haifeng Hu 0001, Chitung Yip |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |
| 2017 | Modified Hidden Factor Analysis for Cross-Age Face RecognitionabstractCross-age face recognition has remained a popular research topic because the sophisticated facial change across age disables regular face recognition systems. Widely applied in age-related tasks, the hidden factor analysis (HFA) model decomposes face feature into independent age and identity factors. However, the hypothesis that the identity and age factors are independent is not in accordance with the fact that aging has different appearance changes on different people's faces. To address this problem, this letter presents a novel method for cross-age face recognition, called age-identity modified HFA, which exploits a new latent factor modeled as a linear combination with the age factor and the identity factor. Hence, the cross-age identity information can be extracted and separated preferably. A maximum likelihood strategy is proposed to judge which gallery face has the same identity with the probe image, while we do not need to know what the probe identity is. Extensive experiments are performed on the benchmark aging datasets MORPH and FG-Net, and the recognition rate of our method outperforms HFA by 10.4% and 1.15%, respectively. Haoxi Li, Haoshan Zou, Haifeng Hu 0001 |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 1 |
| 2017 | Comments on "Iterative Re-Constrained Group Sparse Face Recognition With Adaptive Weights Learning"abstractIn the above paper [1] the authors designed an IRGSC architecture for face recognition with pixel corruption and occlusion. We have discovered that the calculation of the weights vector s in the original paper is flawed. In this comment we demonstrate the correct calculations, and further analysed some of the results in the paper. Haoxi Li, Haifeng Hu 0001, Chitung Yip |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2016 | Patch-based alignment-free generic sparse representation for pose-robust face recognitionabstractSparse representation based classification method has been successfully applied to face recognition in recent years. However, it is still a problem in the scenario of pose variation in face recognition with single sample per person. In this paper, we propose a novel alignment-free model, called Gabor-based Partial Face Sparse Representation (GPFSR), to solve the problem of pose variation in face recognition with single sample per person by using partial face. In our method, we firstly locate five facial landmarks in different images. Then partial face is obtained, which is used to construct Gabor-based local dictionary and compute the weights of each patch. Our classification principle is based on sparse representation. The experimental results on the Multi-PIE and FERET show that GPFSR is robust to pose variation in FR with single sample per person. Jianquan Gu, Haifeng Hu 0001, Haoxi Li, Weipeng Hu |
ICIP | 3 |