Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Taijara Loiola de Santana
dblp:191/3720
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-7716-3244ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 91% Software maintenance and evolution · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › software fault analysis
bug study |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Bug Analysis in Jupyter Notebook Projects: An Empirical Study · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Bug Analysis in Jupyter Notebook Projects: An Empirical Study · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Bug Analysis in Jupyter Notebook Projects: An Empirical Study · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Software maintenance and evolution
technical debt |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Bug Analysis in Jupyter Notebook Projects: An Empirical Study · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.8repository mining · 0.8interviews · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Bug Analysis in Jupyter Notebook Projects: An Empirical StudyabstractComputational notebooks, such as Jupyter, have been widely adopted by data scientists to write code for analyzing and visualizing data. Despite their growing adoption and popularity, few studies have been found to understand Jupyter development challenges from the practitioners’ point of view. This article presents a systematic study of bugs and challenges that Jupyter practitioners face through a large-scale empirical investigation. We mined 14,740 commits from 105 GitHub open source projects with Jupyter Notebook code. Next, we analyzed 30,416 StackOverflow posts, which gave us insights into bugs that practitioners face when developing Jupyter Notebook projects. Next, we conducted 19 interviews with data scientists to uncover more details about Jupyter bugs and to gain insight into Jupyter developers’ challenges. Finally, to validate the study results and proposed taxonomy, we conducted a survey with 91 data scientists. We highlight bug categories, their root causes, and the challenges that Jupyter practitioners face. Taijara Loiola de Santana, Paulo Anselmo da Mota Silveira Neto, Eduardo Santana de Almeida, Iftekhar Ahmed 0001 |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 1 |