Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John Bastian

dblp:191/4642 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › structure from motion
bundle adjustment
0.212016
A Consensus-Based Framework for Distributed Bundle Adjustment · CVPR 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.212016
A Consensus-Based Framework for Distributed Bundle Adjustment · CVPR 2016
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
consensus-based optimization
0.212016
A Consensus-Based Framework for Distributed Bundle Adjustment · CVPR 2016
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
proximal methods
0.212016
A Consensus-Based Framework for Distributed Bundle Adjustment · CVPR 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proximal splitting · 0.5consensus-based optimization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 A Consensus-Based Framework for Distributed Bundle Adjustment
abstract
In this paper we study large-scale optimization problems in multi-view geometry, in particular the Bundle Adjustment problem. In its conventional formulation, the complexity of existing solvers scale poorly with problem size, hence this component of the Structure-from-Motion pipeline can quickly become a bottle-neck. Here we present a novel formulation for solving bundle adjustment in a truly distributed manner using consensus based optimization methods. Our algorithm is presented with a concise derivation based on proximal splitting, along with a theoretical proof of convergence and brief discussions on complexity and implementation. Experiments on a number of real image datasets convincingly demonstrates the potential of the proposed method by outperforming the conventional bundle adjustment formulation by orders of magnitude.
Anders P. Eriksson, John Bastian, Tat-Jun Chin, Mats Isaksson
CVPR2