Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuoguang Yang
dblp:191/4699
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-0915-196XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 52% Mathematical optimization · 41% Approximation and online algorithms · 7% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 70% Optimization for machine learning · 30% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 79% Information retrieval · 21% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › pure exploration
best arm identification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Information-Directed Selection for Top-Two Algorithms · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Information-Directed Selection for Top-Two Algorithms · COLT 2023 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection: Algorithm, Theory and Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection for Tensor Affinities · CVPR 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection: Algorithm, Theory and Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection for Tensor Affinities · CVPR 2016 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Decentralized Gossip-Based Stochastic Bilevel Optimization over Communication Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Distributed systems
distributed optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Decentralized Gossip-Based Stochastic Bilevel Optimization over Communication Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
mechanism design |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revenue Maximization and Learning in Products Ranking · EC 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
product ranking |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revenue Maximization and Learning in Products Ranking · EC 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
revenue maximization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revenue Maximization and Learning in Products Ranking · EC 2021 |
Data mining
model selection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection: Algorithm, Theory and Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection: Algorithm, Theory and Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Data mining › clustering
clustering algorithm selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection for Tensor Affinities · CVPR 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
online stochastic optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection for Tensor Affinities · CVPR 2016 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
information-directed sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Information-Directed Selection for Top-Two Algorithms · COLT 2023 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Revenue Maximization and Learning in Products Ranking · EC 2021 |
Information retrieval › ranking › result ranking
search result ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Revenue Maximization and Learning in Products Ranking · EC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thompson sampling · 1.3optimal allocation · 1.3dual variables · 1.3stochastic optimization · 1.2stochastic bilevel optimization · 1.1gossip protocol · 1.1revenue optimization · 1.0learning · 1.0tensor decomposition · 0.7low-rank and sparse constraints · 0.7positive semi-definite constraints · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Online Linearized LASSOabstractSparse regression has been a popular approach to perform variable selection and enhance the prediction accuracy and interpretability of the resulting statistical model. Existing approaches focus on offline regularized regression, while the online scenario has rarely been studied. In this paper, we propose a novel online sparse linear regression framework for analyzing streaming data when data points arrive sequentially. Our proposed method is memory efficient and requires less stringent restricted strong convexity assumptions. Theoretically, we show that with a properly chosen regularization parameter, the $\ell_2$-error of our estimator decays to zero at the optimal order of $\tilde \mathcal{O}(\frac{s}{\sqrt{t}})$, where $s$ is the sparsity level, $t$ is the streaming sample size, and $\tilde \mathcal{O}(\cdot)$ hides logarithmic terms. Numerical experiments demonstrate the practical efficiency of our algorithm. Shuoguang Yang, Yuhao Yan, Xiuneng Zhu |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2023 | Information-Directed Selection for Top-Two AlgorithmsabstractWe consider the best-k-arm identification problem for multi-armed bandits, where the objective is to select the exact set of k arms with the highest mean rewards by sequentially allocating measurement effort. We characterize the necessary and sufficient conditions for the optimal allocation using dual variables. Remarkably these optimality conditions lead to the extension of top-two algorithm design principle (Russo, 2020), initially proposed for best-arm identification. Furthermore, our optimality conditions induce a simple and effective selection rule dubbed information-directed selection (IDS) that selects one of the top-two candidates based on a measure of information gain. As a theoretical guarantee, we prove that integrated with IDS, top-two Thompson sampling is (asymptotically) optimal for Gaussian best-arm identification, solving a glaring open problem in the pure exploration literature (Russo, 2020). As a by-product, we show that for $k > 1$, top-two algorithms cannot achieve optimality even with an oracle tuning parameter. Numerical experiments show the superior performance of the proposed top-two algorithms with IDS and considerable improvement compared with algorithms without adaptive selection. Shuoguang Yang |
COLT | 4 |
| 2022 | Decentralized Gossip-Based Stochastic Bilevel Optimization over Communication NetworksabstractBilevel optimization have gained growing interests, with numerous applications found in meta learning, minimax games, reinforcement learning, and nested composition optimization. This paper studies the problem of decentralized distributed bilevel optimization over a network where agents can only communicate with neighbors, and gives examples from multi-task, multi-agent learning and federated learning.In this paper, we propose a gossip-based distributed bilevel learning algorithm that allows networked agents to solve both the inner and outer optimization problems in a single timescale and share information through network propagation. We show that our algorithm enjoys the $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{K \epsilon^2})$ per-agent sample complexity for general nonconvex bilevel optimization and $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{K \epsilon})$ for Polyak-Łojasiewicz objective, achieving a speedup that scales linearly with the network size $K$. The sample complexities are optimal in both $\epsilon$ and $K$.We test our algorithm on the examples of hyperparameter tuning and decentralized reinforcement learning. Simulated experiments confirmed that our algorithm achieves the state-of-the-art training efficiency and test accuracy. Shuoguang Yang, Xuezhou Zhang, Mengdi Wang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Revenue Maximization and Learning in Products RankingabstractOnline retailing has seen steady growth over the last decade. According to the Digital Commerce (formerly Internet Retailer) analysis of the US Commerce Department's year-end retail data, online sales constituted 16% of all retail sales in 2019, and is forecast to reach higher levels in the next years due to the impact of COVID-19. For an online retailer, one of the most important decisions is the products' display positioning as it plays a crucial role in shaping customers' shopping behavior. Empirical evidence abounds. Baye et al. [2] find that a consumer's likelihood of purchasing from a firm is strongly related to the order in which the firm is listed on a webpage by a search engine. In the online advertising industry, it has been widely observed that ads placed higher on a webpage attract more clicks from consumers [1]. Given the importance of product ranking positions, the key question for online retailers is how to rank the products to maximize the revenue. Ningyuan Chen, Anran Li 0002, Shuoguang Yang |
EC | 3 |
| 2018 | Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection: Algorithm, Theory and ApplicationsabstractWhile clustering has been well studied in the past decade, model selection has drawn much less attention due to the difficulty of the problem. In this paper, we address both problems in a joint manner by recovering an ideal affinity tensor from an imperfect input. By taking into account the relationship of the affinities induced by the cluster structures, we are able to significantly improve the affinity input, such as repairing those entries corrupted by gross outliers. More importantly, the recovered ideal affinity tensor also directly indicates the number of clusters and their membership, thus solving the model selection and clustering jointly. To enforce the requisite global consistency in the affinities demanded by the cluster structure, we impose a number of constraints, specifically, among others, the tensor should be low rank and sparse, and it should obey what we call the rank-1 sum constraint. To solve this highly non-smooth and non-convex problem, we exploit the mathematical structures, and express the original problem in an equivalent form amenable for numerical optimization and convergence analysis. To scale to large problem sizes, we also propose an alternative formulation, so that those problems can be efficiently solved via stochastic optimization in an online fashion. We evaluate our algorithm with different applications to demonstrate its superiority, and show it can adapt to a large variety of settings. Zhuwen Li, Loong Fah Cheong, Shuoguang Yang, Kim-Chuan Toh |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2016 | Simultaneous Clustering and Model Selection for Tensor AffinitiesabstractEstimating the number of clusters remains a difficult model selection problem. We consider this problem in the domain where the affinity relations involve groups of more than two nodes. Building on the previous formulation for the pairwise affinity case, we exploit the mathematical structures in the higher order case. We express the original minimal-rank and positive semi-definite (PSD) constraints in a form amenable for numerical implementation, as the original constraints are either intractable or even undefined in general in the higher order case. To scale to large problem sizes, we also propose an alternative formulation, so that it can be efficiently solved via stochastic optimization in an online fashion. We evaluate our algorithm with different applications to demonstrate its superiority, and show it can adapt to varying levels of unbalancedness of clusters. Zhuwen Li, Shuoguang Yang, Loong Fah Cheong, Kim-Chuan Toh |
CVPR | 2 |