Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ryozo Nagai

dblp:191/6235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 87% Question answering and dialogue systems · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
causal relation extraction
0.912025
Causal Tree Extraction from Medical Case Reports: A Novel Task for Experts-like Text Comprehension · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › biomedical text mining
clinical information extraction
0.912025
Causal Tree Extraction from Medical Case Reports: A Novel Task for Experts-like Text Comprehension · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › domain-specific question answering
medical question answering
0.312025
Causal Tree Extraction from Medical Case Reports: A Novel Task for Experts-like Text Comprehension · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generation-based extraction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Causal Tree Extraction from Medical Case Reports: A Novel Task for Experts-like Text Comprehension
abstract
Extracting causal relationships from a medical case report is essential for comprehending the case, particularly its diagnostic process.Since the diagnostic process is regarded as a bottom-up inference, causal relationships in cases naturally form a multi-layered tree structure.The existing tasks, such as medical relation extraction, are insufficient for capturing the causal relationships of an entire case, as they treat all relations equally without considering the hierarchical structure inherent in the diagnostic process.Thus, we propose a novel task, Causal Tree Extraction (CTE), which receives a case report and generates a causal tree with the primary disease as the root, providing an intuitive understanding of a case's diagnostic process.Subsequently, we construct a Japanese case report CTE dataset, J-Casemap, propose a generation-based CTE method that outperforms the baseline by 20.2 points in the human evaluation, and introduce evaluation metrics that reflect clinician preferences.Further experiments also show that J-Casemap enhances the performance of solving other medical tasks, such as question answering.
Sakiko Yahata, Fei Cheng 0002, Sadao Kurohashi, Hisahiko Sato, Ryozo Nagai
EMNLP6