Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zane T. Smith
dblp:191/6668
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 59% Mathematical optimization · 22% Coding theory · 15% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 56% Data integration and cleaning · 44% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Wasserstein Transform · ICML 2019 |
Data integration and cleaning
data preprocessing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Wasserstein Transform · ICML 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Wasserstein Transform · ICML 2019 |
Coding theory › source coding › rate-distortion theory
distortion bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures
metric embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › hierarchical clustering
single-linkage clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › metric embedding
tree embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | The Wasserstein Transform · ICML 2019 |
Computational geometry
metric space |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal transport · 0.8mean shift · 0.8stability analysis · 0.2gromov embedding · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | The Wasserstein TransformabstractWe introduce the Wasserstein transform, a method for enhancing and denoising datasets defined on general metric spaces. The construction draws inspiration from Optimal Transportation ideas. We establish the stability of our method under data perturbation and, when the dataset is assumed to be Euclidean, we also exhibit a precise connection between the Wasserstein transform and the mean shift family of algorithms. We then use this connection to prove that mean shift also inherits stability under perturbations. We study the performance of the Wasserstein transform method on different datasets as a preprocessing step prior to clustering and classification tasks. Facundo Mémoli, Zane T. Smith, Zhengchao Wan |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric SpacesabstractEstimating optimal phylogenetic trees or hierarchical clustering trees from metric data is an important problem in evolutionary biology and data analysis. Intuitively, the goodness-of-fit of a metric space to a tree depends on its inherent treeness, as well as other metric properties such as intrinsic dimension. Existing algorithms for embedding metric spaces into tree metrics provide distortion bounds depending on cardinality. Because cardinality is a simple property of any set, we argue that such bounds do not fully capture the rich structure endowed by the metric. We consider an embedding of a metric space into a tree proposed by Gromov. By proving a stability result, we obtain an improved additive distortion bound depending only on the hyperbolicity and doubling dimension of the metric. We observe that Gromov's method is dual to the well-known single linkage hierarchical clustering (SLHC) method. By means of this duality, we are able to transport our results to the setting of SLHC, where such additive distortion bounds were previously unknown. Samir Chowdhury 0001, Facundo Mémoli, Zane T. Smith |
NIPS | 3 |