Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zane T. Smith

dblp:191/6668 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 59% Mathematical optimization · 22% Coding theory · 15%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 56% Data integration and cleaning · 44%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.412019
The Wasserstein Transform · ICML 2019
Data integration and cleaning
data preprocessing
0.412019
The Wasserstein Transform · ICML 2019
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.412019
The Wasserstein Transform · ICML 2019
Coding theory › source coding › rate-distortion theory
distortion bounds
0.212016
Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
hierarchical clustering
0.212016
Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016
Algorithms and data structures
metric embedding
0.212016
Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › hierarchical clustering
single-linkage clustering
0.212016
Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016
Algorithms and data structures › metric embedding
tree embedding
0.212016
Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.112019
The Wasserstein Transform · ICML 2019
Computational geometry
metric space
0.112016
Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal transport · 0.8mean shift · 0.8stability analysis · 0.2gromov embedding · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 The Wasserstein Transform
abstract
We introduce the Wasserstein transform, a method for enhancing and denoising datasets defined on general metric spaces. The construction draws inspiration from Optimal Transportation ideas. We establish the stability of our method under data perturbation and, when the dataset is assumed to be Euclidean, we also exhibit a precise connection between the Wasserstein transform and the mean shift family of algorithms. We then use this connection to prove that mean shift also inherits stability under perturbations. We study the performance of the Wasserstein transform method on different datasets as a preprocessing step prior to clustering and classification tasks.
Facundo Mémoli, Zane T. Smith, Zhengchao Wan
ICML2
2016 Improved Error Bounds for Tree Representations of Metric Spaces
abstract
Estimating optimal phylogenetic trees or hierarchical clustering trees from metric data is an important problem in evolutionary biology and data analysis. Intuitively, the goodness-of-fit of a metric space to a tree depends on its inherent treeness, as well as other metric properties such as intrinsic dimension. Existing algorithms for embedding metric spaces into tree metrics provide distortion bounds depending on cardinality. Because cardinality is a simple property of any set, we argue that such bounds do not fully capture the rich structure endowed by the metric. We consider an embedding of a metric space into a tree proposed by Gromov. By proving a stability result, we obtain an improved additive distortion bound depending only on the hyperbolicity and doubling dimension of the metric. We observe that Gromov's method is dual to the well-known single linkage hierarchical clustering (SLHC) method. By means of this duality, we are able to transport our results to the setting of SLHC, where such additive distortion bounds were previously unknown.
Samir Chowdhury 0001, Facundo Mémoli, Zane T. Smith
NIPS3