EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Davide Falanga
dblp:192/1879
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-7878-4621ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 33% Legged, aerial and field robots · 30% Reinforcement learning · 21% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › continuous control
morphology-aware control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Geometry-aware Compensation Scheme for Morphing Drones · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Geometry-aware Compensation Scheme for Morphing Drones · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots |
0.4 | 2 | 2021 | Aggressive quadrotor flight through narrow gaps with onboard sensing and computing using active vision · ICRA 2017 Geometry-aware Compensation Scheme for Morphing Drones · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Aggressive quadrotor flight through narrow gaps with onboard sensing and computing using active vision · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › quadrotor
quadrotor flight |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Aggressive quadrotor flight through narrow gaps with onboard sensing and computing using active vision · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Aggressive quadrotor flight through narrow gaps with onboard sensing and computing using active vision · ICRA 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
experimental characterization · 0.5control scheme design · 0.5trajectory replanning · 0.3active vision · 0.3IMU fusion · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Geometry-aware Compensation Scheme for Morphing DronesabstractRecent studies have shown that enabling drones to change their morphology in flight can significantly increase their versatility in different tasks. In this paper, we investigate the aerodynamic effects caused by the partial overlap between the propellers and the main body of a morphing quadrotor during flight. We experimentally characterize such effects and design a morphology-aware control scheme to compensate them. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by deploying the compensation scheme on a quadrotor that can fold its arms around the main body, comparing it against the same controller without the compensation scheme. Experimental results show that our compensation scheme can address the loss of thrust due to the overlap between the main body and the propellers, guaranteeing higher tracking accuracy, without requiring complex and computationally expensive aerodynamical models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work counteracting the aerodynamic effects of a morphing quadrotor during flight and showing the effects of partial overlap between a propeller and the central body of the drone. Amedeo Fabris, Kevin Kleber, Davide Falanga, Davide Scaramuzza 0001 |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2018 | PAMPC: Perception-Aware Model Predictive Control for QuadrotorsabstractWe present the first perception-aware model predictive control framework for quadrotors that unifies control and planning with respect to action and perception objectives. Our framework leverages numerical optimization to compute trajectories that satisfy the system dynamics and require control inputs within the limits of the platform. Simultaneously, it optimizes perception objectives for robust and reliable sensing by maximizing the visibility of a point of interest and minimizing its velocity in the image plane. Considering both perception and action objectives for motion planning and control is challenging due to the possible conflicts arising from their respective requirements. For example, for a quadrotor to track a reference trajectory, it needs to rotate to align its thrust with the direction of the desired acceleration. However, the perception objective might require to minimize such rotation to maximize the visibility of a point of interest. A model-based optimization framework, able to consider both perception and action objectives and couple them through the system dynamics, is therefore necessary. Our perception-aware model predictive control framework works in a receding-horizon fashion by iteratively solving a non-linear optimization problem. It is capable of running in real-time, fully onboard our lightweight, small-scale quadrotor using a low-power ARM computer, together with a visual-inertial odometry pipeline. We validate our approach in experiments demonstrating (I) the conflict between perception and action objectives, and (II) improved behavior in extremely challenging lighting conditions. Davide Falanga, Philipp Foehn, Peng Lu 0003, Davide Scaramuzza 0001 |
IROS | 1 |
| 2017 | Aggressive quadrotor flight through narrow gaps with onboard sensing and computing using active visionabstractWe address one of the main challenges towards autonomous quadrotor flight in complex environments, which is flight through narrow gaps. While previous works relied on off-board localization systems or on accurate prior knowledge of the gap position and orientation in the world reference frame, we rely solely on onboard sensing and computing and estimate the full state by fusing gap detection from a single onboard camera with an IMU. This problem is challenging for two reasons: (i) the quadrotor pose uncertainty with respect to the gap increases quadratically with the distance from the gap; (ii) the quadrotor has to actively control its orientation towards the gap to enable state estimation (i.e., active vision). We solve this problem by generating a trajectory that considers geometric, dynamic, and perception constraints: during the approach maneuver, the quadrotor always faces the gap to allow state estimation, while respecting the vehicle dynamics; during the traverse through the gap, the distance of the quadrotor to the edges of the gap is maximized. Furthermore, we replan the trajectory during its execution to cope with the varying uncertainty of the state estimate. We successfully evaluate and demonstrate the proposed approach in many real experiments, achieving a success rate of 80% and gap orientations up to 45°. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that addresses and achieves autonomous, aggressive flight through narrow gaps using only onboard sensing and computing and without prior knowledge of the pose of the gap. Davide Falanga, Elias Mueggler, Matthias Faessler, Davide Scaramuzza 0001 |
ICRA | 1 |