Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Levon Nurbekyan
dblp:192/2896
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-6227-0941ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 67% Generative modeling · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
continuous-time generative model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | How to Train Your Neural ODE: the World of Jacobian and Kinetic Regularization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | How to Train Your Neural ODE: the World of Jacobian and Kinetic Regularization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
training regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | How to Train Your Neural ODE: the World of Jacobian and Kinetic Regularization · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability regularization · 0.4optimal transport regularization · 0.4adaptive ODE solver · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | How to Train Your Neural ODE: the World of Jacobian and Kinetic RegularizationabstractTraining neural ODEs on large datasets has not been tractable due to the necessity of allowing the adaptive numerical ODE solver to refine its step size to very small values. In practice this leads to dynamics equivalent to many hundreds or even thousands of layers. In this paper, we overcome this apparent difficulty by introducing a theoretically-grounded combination of both optimal transport and stability regularizations which encourage neural ODEs to prefer simpler dynamics out of all the dynamics that solve a problem well. Simpler dynamics lead to faster convergence and to fewer discretizations of the solver, considerably decreasing wall-clock time without loss in performance. Our approach allows us to train neural ODE-based generative models to the same performance as the unregularized dynamics, with significant reductions in training time. This brings neural ODEs closer to practical relevance in large-scale applications. Chris Finlay, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Levon Nurbekyan, Adam M. Oberman |
ICML | 3 |