Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marten Lienen
dblp:192/3468
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 31% Deep learning architectures and training · 21% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 18% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 67% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 33% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 2 | 2025 | Add and Thin: Diffusion for Temporal Point Processes · NeurIPS 2023 Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process prior |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | UnHiPPO: Uncertainty-aware Initialization for State Space Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | UnHiPPO: Uncertainty-aware Initialization for State Space Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | UnHiPPO: Uncertainty-aware Initialization for State Space Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
generative surrogate model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From Zero to Turbulence: Generative Modeling for 3D Flow Simulation · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
computational fluid dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From Zero to Turbulence: Generative Modeling for 3D Flow Simulation · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
turbulence simulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From Zero to Turbulence: Generative Modeling for 3D Flow Simulation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
temporal point process |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Add and Thin: Diffusion for Temporal Point Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › computational physics
physics simulation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning the Dynamics of Physical Systems from Sparse Observations with Finite Element Networks · ICLR 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Optimal Transport in High Dimensions for Graph Distances, Embedding Alignment, and More · ICML 2021 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › metric graph theory
graph distance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Optimal Transport in High Dimensions for Graph Distances, Embedding Alignment, and More · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Optimal Transport in High Dimensions for Graph Distances, Embedding Alignment, and More · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching › feature alignment
embedding alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Optimal Transport in High Dimensions for Graph Distances, Embedding Alignment, and More · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal transport · 1.9generative modeling · 1.5autoregressive model · 1.5finite element method · 1.1posterior inference · 0.9linear stochastic control · 0.9gaussian process · 0.9conditional flow matching · 0.9denoising diffusion probabilistic model · 0.7autoregressive neural network · 0.7neural network · 0.6graph laplacian · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series ForecastingabstractRecent advancements in generative modeling, particularly diffusion models, have opened new directions for time series modeling, achieving state-of-the-art performance in forecasting and synthesis. However, the reliance of diffusion-based models on a simple, fixed prior complicates the generative process since the data and prior distributions differ significantly. We introduce TSFlow, a conditional flow matching (CFM) model for time series combining Gaussian processes, optimal transport paths, and data-dependent prior distributions. By incorporating (conditional) Gaussian processes, TSFlow aligns the prior distribution more closely with the temporal structure of the data, enhancing both unconditional and conditional generation. Furthermore, we propose conditional prior sampling to enable probabilistic forecasting with an unconditionally trained model. In our experimental evaluation on eight real-world datasets, we demonstrate the generative capabilities of TSFlow, producing high-quality unconditional samples. Finally, we show that both conditionally and unconditionally trained models achieve competitive results across multiple forecasting benchmarks. Marcel Kollovieh, Marten Lienen, David Lüdke, Leo Schwinn, Stephan Günnemann |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | UnHiPPO: Uncertainty-aware Initialization for State Space ModelsabstractState space models are emerging as a dominant model class for sequence problems with many relying on the HiPPO framework to initialize their dynamics. However, HiPPO fundamentally assumes data to be noise-free; an assumption often violated in practice. We extend the HiPPO theory with measurement noise and derive an uncertainty-aware initialization for state space model dynamics. In our analysis, we interpret HiPPO as a linear stochastic control problem where the data enters as a noise-free control signal. We then reformulate the problem so that the data become noisy outputs of a latent system and arrive at an alternative dynamics initialization that infers the posterior of this latent system from the data without increasing runtime. Our experiments show that our initialization improves the resistance of state-space models to noise both at training and inference time. Marten Lienen, Abdullah Saydemir, Stephan Günnemann |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | From Zero to Turbulence: Generative Modeling for 3D Flow SimulationabstractSimulations of turbulent flows in 3D are one of the most expensive simulations in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Many works have been written on surrogate models to replace numerical solvers for fluid flows with faster, learned, autoregressive models. However, the intricacies of turbulence in three dimensions necessitate training these models with very small time steps, while generating realistic flow states requires either long roll-outs with many steps and significant error accumulation or starting from a known, realistic flow state—something we aimed to avoid in the first place. Instead, we propose to approach turbulent flow simulation as a generative task directly learning the manifold of all possible turbulent flow states without relying on any initial flow state. For our experiments, we introduce a challenging 3D turbulence dataset of high-resolution flows and detailed vortex structures caused by various objects and derive two novel sample evaluation metrics for turbulent flows. On this dataset, we show that our generative model captures the distribution of turbulent flows caused by unseen objects and generates high-quality, realistic samples amenable for downstream applications without access to any initial state. Marten Lienen, David Lüdke, Jan Hansen-Palmus, Stephan Günnemann |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Add and Thin: Diffusion for Temporal Point ProcessesabstractAutoregressive neural networks within the temporal point process (TPP) framework have become the standard for modeling continuous-time event data. Even though these models can expressively capture event sequences in a one-step-ahead fashion, they are inherently limited for long-term forecasting applications due to the accumulation of errors caused by their sequential nature. To overcome these limitations, we derive ADD-THIN, a principled probabilistic denoising diffusion model for TPPs that operates on entire event sequences. Unlike existing diffusion approaches, ADD-THIN naturally handles data with discrete and continuous components. In experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, our model matches the state-of-the-art TPP models in density estimation and strongly outperforms them in forecasting. David Lüdke, Marin Bilos, Oleksandr Shchur, Marten Lienen, Stephan Günnemann |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | Learning the Dynamics of Physical Systems from Sparse Observations with Finite Element Networks
Marten Lienen, Stephan Günnemann |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Scalable Optimal Transport in High Dimensions for Graph Distances, Embedding Alignment, and More
Johannes Gasteiger, Marten Lienen, Stephan Günnemann |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | Rate-Adaptive Link Quality Estimation for Coded Packet NetworksabstractCoded packet networks allow for proactive injection of redundant packets to compensate for packet loss. Link metrics are usually based on the estimated transmission counter (ETX). This metric is used to determine the expected number of coded packets needed, but does not make guarantees for a specific decoding probability. In this paper we show that relying on the ETX metric leads to a surprisingly high probability that decoding is not possible. Based on this result, we derive a redundancy scheme to allow for an adjustable decoding probability. In a third step, we extend this scheme to also consider the reliability of link quality estimates themselves. We provide a numerically stable and hardware-accelerated implementation of our redundancy scheme, and compare all approaches in a simulated environment. Finally, we show the effect of the new redundancy scheme on different transport layer protocols in a wireless setup with random linear network coding. Maurice Leclaire, Stephan M. Günther, Marten Lienen, Maximilian Riemensberger, Georg Carle |
LCN | 3 |