Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sigmund Albert Gorski III

dblp:192/6848 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 44% Web and mobile security · 44% Authentication and access control · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and mobile security › mobile security
android security
0.612022
FReD: Identifying File Re-Delegation in Android System Services · USENIX Security Symposium 2022
Systems and software security
operating system security
0.612022
FReD: Identifying File Re-Delegation in Android System Services · USENIX Security Symposium 2022
Authentication and access control › authorization
delegated authorization
0.212022
FReD: Identifying File Re-Delegation in Android System Services · USENIX Security Symposium 2022
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 FReD: Identifying File Re-Delegation in Android System Services
Sigmund Albert Gorski III, Seaver Thorn, William Enck, Haining Chen
USENIX Security Symposium1
2019 ACMiner: Extraction and Analysis of Authorization Checks in Android's Middleware
abstract
Billions of users rely on the security of the Android platform to protect phones, tablets, and many different types of consumer electronics. While Android's permission model is well studied, the enforcement of the protection policy has received relatively little attention. Much of this enforcement is spread across system services, taking the form of hard-coded checks within their implementations. In this paper, we propose Authorization Check Miner (ACMiner), a framework for evaluating the correctness of Android's access control enforcement through consistency analysis of authorization checks. ACMiner combines program and text analysis techniques to generate a rich set of authorization checks, mines the corresponding protection policy for each service entry point, and uses association rule mining at a service granularity to identify inconsistencies that may correspond to vulnerabilities. We used ACMiner to study the AOSP version of Android 7.1.1 to identify 28 vulnerabilities relating to missing authorization checks. In doing so, we demonstrate ACMiner's ability to help domain experts process thousands of authorization checks scattered across millions of lines of code.
Sigmund Albert Gorski III, Benjamin Andow, Adwait Nadkarni, Sunil Manandhar, William Enck, Eric Bodden, Alexandre Bartel
CODASPY1
2019 ARF: identifying re-delegation vulnerabilities in Android system services
abstract
Over the past decade, the security of the Android platform has undergone significant scrutiny by both academic and industrial researchers. This scrutiny has been largely directed towards third-party applications and a few critical system interfaces, leaving much of Android's middleware unstudied. Building upon recent efforts to more rigorously analyze authorization logic in Android's system services, we revisit the problem of permission re-delegation, but in the context of system service entry points. In this paper, we propose the Android Re-delegation Finder (ARF) analysis framework for helping security analysts identify permission re-delegation vulnerabilities within Android's system services. ARF analyzes an interconnected graph of entry points in system services, deriving calling dependencies, annotating permission checks, and identifying potentially vulnerable deputies that improperly expose information or functionality to third-party applications. We apply ARF to Android AOSP version 8.1.0 and find that it refines the set of 15,483 paths between entry points down to a manageable set of 490 paths. Upon manual inspection, we found that 170 paths improperly exposed information or functionality, consisting of 86 vulnerable deputies. Through this effort, we demonstrate the need for continued investigation of automated tools to analyze the authorization logic within the Android middleware.
Sigmund Albert Gorski III, William Enck
WiSec1