Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Brandon Matthews

dblp:192/7480 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8673-2434ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 50% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 38% Design research and methods · 12%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
multimodal data analysis
0.912025
Starting Your Multimodal HRI Study Journey · HRI 2025
Haptics and multimodal interaction
multimodal interaction
0.912025
Starting Your Multimodal HRI Study Journey · HRI 2025
Design research and methods
research methodology
0.312025
Starting Your Multimodal HRI Study Journey · HRI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensor fusion · 0.9frequentist analysis · 0.9feature extraction · 0.9bayesian analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Starting Your Multimodal HRI Study Journey
abstract
This tutorial aims to equip researchers with the knowledge and skills to leverage multimodal data in human-robot interaction (HRI) studies. It covers the HRI study cycle, from sensor selection to data analysis, introducing commonly used sensors, pre-processing data, feature extraction techniques, fusion techniques and analysis techniques: both frequentist and Bayesian. Hands-on exercises using public datasets are designed to provide practical experience. The concluding panel discussion on ethics and bias in HRI is focused on fostering broader ethical considerations of HRI studies. Website tutorial is found online at https://sites.google.com/monash.edu/multimodal-hri-study-tutorial.
Kavindie Katuwandeniya, Hashini Senaratne, Yanran Jiang, Brandon Matthews, Leimin Tian, Dana Kulic
HRI4
2016 Cross-layer personalization as a first-class citizen for situation awareness and computer infrastructure security
abstract
We propose a new security paradigm that makes cross-layer personalization a premier component in the design of security solutions for computer infrastructure and situational awareness. This paradigm is based on the observation that computer systems have a personalized usage profile that depends on the user and his activities. Further, it spans the various layers of abstraction that make up a computer system, as if the user embedded his own DNA into the computer system. To realize such a paradigm, we discuss the design of a comprehensive and cross-layer profiling approach, which can be adopted to boost the effectiveness of various security solutions, e.g., malware detection, insider attacker prevention and continuous authentication. The current state-of-the-art in computer infrastructure defense solutions focuses on one layer of operation with deployments coming in a "one size fits all" format, without taking into account the unique way people use their computers. The key novelty of our proposal is the cross-layer personalization, where we derive the distinguishable behaviors from the intelligence of three layers of abstraction. First, we combine intelligence from: a) the user layer, (e.g., mouse click patterns); b) the operating system layer; c) the network layer. Second, we develop cross-layer personalized profiles for system usage. We will limit our scope to companies and organizations, where computers are used in a more routine and one-on-one style, before we expand our research to personally owned computers. Our preliminary results show that just the time accesses in user web logs are already sufficient to distinguish users from each other,with users of the same demographics showing similarities in their profiles. Our goal is to challenge today's paradigm for anomaly detection that seems to follow a monoculture and treat each layer in isolation. We also discuss deployment, performance overhead, and privacy issues raised by our paradigm.
Aokun Chen, Pratik Prabhanjan Brahma, Dapeng Oliver Wu, Natalie C. Ebner, Brandon Matthews, Jedidiah R. Crandall, Xuetao Wei, Michalis Faloutsos, Daniela Oliveira 0001
NSPW5