Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samrat Phatale
dblp:192/7541
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 56% Reinforcement learning · 41% Trustworthy machine learning · 4% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPO · AAAI 2025 RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
multi-objective alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPO · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPO · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback › learning from human feedback
AI feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-improvement |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt conditioning · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9reward model training · 0.8reinforcement learning from AI feedback · 0.8direct-RLAIF · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPOabstractMulti-objective preference alignment of large language models (LLMs) is critical for developing AI systems that are more configurable, personalizable, helpful, and safe. However, optimizing model outputs to satisfy diverse objectives with variable weights at inference time for truly personalized models presents a significant challenge. Existing approaches are either computationally expensive to train or do not sufficiently steer model behaviors. This paper introduces the Multi-Objective Online DPO (MO-ODPO) algorithm, designed to robustly and efficiently align model behaviors with multiple, potentially conflicting human preferences. Our approach incorporates a prompt conditioning mechanism, allowing us to train a single preference-conditional policy, that can adapt to new preference combinations at inference. Experiments on two popular benchmarks show that MO-ODPO Pareto-dominates existing baselines while providing excellent inference-time steerability between diverse objectives. Ryan Sullivan, Yunxuan Li, Samrat Phatale, Abhinav Rastogi |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2024 | RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackabstractReinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, but gathering high-quality preference labels is expensive. RL from AI Feedback (RLAIF), introduced in Bai et al. (2022b), offers a promising alternative that trains the reward model (RM) on preferences generated by an off-the-shelf LLM. Across the tasks of summarization, helpful dialogue generation, and harmless dialogue generation, we show that RLAIF achieves comparable performance to RLHF. Furthermore, we take a step towards "self-improvement" by demonstrating that RLAIF can outperform a supervised fine-tuned baseline even when the AI labeler is the same size as the policy, or even the exact same checkpoint as the initial policy. Finally, we introduce direct-RLAIF (d-RLAIF) - a technique that circumvents RM training by obtaining rewards directly from an off-the-shelf LLM during RL, which achieves superior performance to canonical RLAIF. Our results suggest that RLAIF can achieve performance on-par with using human feedback, offering a potential solution to the scalability limitations of RLHF. Harrison Lee 0001, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard, Johan Ferret, Kellie Lu, Colton Bishop, Ethan Hall, Victor Carbune, Abhinav Rastogi, Sushant Prakash |
ICML | 2 |