Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Regan
dblp:192/8983
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0472-6979ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
mass spectrometry imaging |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | massNet: integrated processing and classification of spatially resolved mass spectrometry data using deep learning for rapid tumor delineation · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › ChIP-seq analysis
peak detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | massNet: integrated processing and classification of spatially resolved mass spectrometry data using deep learning for rapid tumor delineation · Bioinform. 2022 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › medical image segmentation › lesion segmentation
tumor segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | massNet: integrated processing and classification of spatially resolved mass spectrometry data using deep learning for rapid tumor delineation · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep learning · 0.6cross-validation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Linear Cross-document Event Coreference Resolution with X-AMRabstractEvent Coreference Resolution (ECR) as a pairwise mention classification task is expensive both for automated systems and manual annotations. The task’s quadratic difficulty is exacerbated when using Large Language Models (LLMs), making prompt engineering for ECR prohibitively costly. In this work, we propose a graphical representation of events, X-AMR, anchored around individual mentions using a cross-document version of Abstract Meaning Representation. We then linearize the ECR with a novel multi-hop coreference algorithm over the event graphs. The event graphs simplify ECR, making it a) LLM cost-effective, b) compositional and interpretable, and c) easily annotated. For a fair assessment, we first enrich an existing ECR benchmark dataset with these event graphs using an annotator-friendly tool we introduce. Then, we employ GPT-4, the newest LLM by OpenAI, for these annotations. Finally, using the ECR algorithm, we assess GPT-4 against humans and analyze its limitations. Through this research, we aim to advance the state-of-the-art for efficient ECR and shed light on the potential shortcomings of current LLMs at this task. Code and annotations: https://github.com/ahmeshaf/gpt_coref Shafiuddin Rehan Ahmed, George Arthur Baker, Evi Judge, Michael Regan, Kristin Wright-Bettner, Martha Palmer, James H. Martin |
LREC/COLING | 4 |
| 2023 | Navigating Wanderland: Highlighting Off-Task Discussions in Classrooms
Ananya Ganesh, Michael Alan Chang, Rachel Dickler, Michael Regan, Jon Z. Cai, Kristin Wright-Bettner, James Pustejovsky, James H. Martin, Jeffrey Flanigan, Martha Palmer, Katharina Kann |
AIED | 4 |
| 2023 | A Comparative Analysis of Automatic Speech Recognition Errors in Small Group Classroom DiscourseabstractIn collaborative learning environments, effective intelligent learning systems need to accurately analyze and understand the collaborative discourse between learners (i.e., group modeling) to provide adaptive support. We investigate how automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors influence discourse models of small group collaboration in noisy real-world classrooms. Our dataset consisted of 30 students recorded by consumer off-the-shelf microphones (Yeti Blue) while engaging in dyadic- and triadic- collaborative learning in a multi-day STEM curriculum unit. We found that two state-of-the-art ASR systems (Google Speech and OpenAI Whisper) yielded very high word error rates (0.822, 0.847) but very different profiles of error with Google being more conservative, rejecting 38% of utterances instead of 12% for Whisper. Next, we examined how these ASR errors influenced down-stream small group modeling based on pre-trained large language models for three tasks: Abstract Meaning Representation parsing (AMRParsing), on-task/off-task detection (OnTask), and Accountable Productive Talk prediction (TalkMove). As expected, models trained on clean human transcripts yielded degraded performance on all three tasks, measured by the transfer ratio (TR). However, the TR of the specific sentence-level AMRParsing task (.39 - .62) was much lower than that of the abstract discourse-level OnTask (.63- .94) and TalkMove tasks (.64-.72). Furthermore, different training strategies that incorporated ASR transcripts alone or as augmentations of human transcripts increased accuracy for the discourse-level tasks (OnTask and TalkMove) but not AMRParsing. Simulation experiments suggested that the models were tolerant of missing utterances in the dialog context, and that jointly improving ASR accuracy on important word classes (e.g., verbs and nouns) can improve performance across all tasks. Overall, our results provide insights into how different types of NLP-based tasks might be tolerant of ASR errors under extremely noisy conditions and provide suggestions for how to improve accuracy in small group modeling settings for a more equitable, engaging, and adaptive collaborative learning environment. Jie Cao 0010, Ananya Ganesh, Jon Z. Cai, Rosy Southwell, Margaret Perkoff, Michael Regan, Katharina Kann, James H. Martin, Martha Palmer, Sidney K. D'Mello |
UMAP | 6 |
| 2022 | massNet: integrated processing and classification of spatially resolved mass spectrometry data using deep learning for rapid tumor delineationabstractMOTIVATION: Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) provides rich biochemical information in a label-free manner and therefore holds promise to substantially impact current practice in disease diagnosis. However, the complex nature of MSI data poses computational challenges in its analysis. The complexity of the data arises from its large size, high-dimensionality and spectral nonlinearity. Preprocessing, including peak picking, has been used to reduce raw data complexity; however, peak picking is sensitive to parameter selection that, perhaps prematurely, shapes the downstream analysis for tissue classification and ensuing biological interpretation. RESULTS: We propose a deep learning model, massNet, that provides the desired qualities of scalability, nonlinearity and speed in MSI data analysis. This deep learning model was used, without prior preprocessing and peak picking, to classify MSI data from a mouse brain harboring a patient-derived tumor. The massNet architecture established automatically learning of predictive features, and automated methods were incorporated to identify peaks with potential for tumor delineation. The model's performance was assessed using cross-validation, and the results demonstrate higher accuracy and a substantial gain in speed compared to the established classical machine learning method, support vector machine. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/wabdelmoula/massNet. The data underlying this article are available in the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) Metabolomics Workbench under project id (PR001292) with http://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8Q70T. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Walid M. Abdelmoula, Sylwia Stopka, Elizabeth C. Randall, Michael Regan, Jeffrey N. Agar, Jann N. Sarkaria, William M. Wells III, Tina Kapur, Nathalie Y. R. Agar |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2018 | AMR Beyond the Sentence: the Multi-sentence AMR corpusabstractThere are few corpora that endeavor to represent the semantic content of entire documents. We present a corpus that accomplishes one way of capturing document level semantics, by annotating coreference and similar phenomena (bridging and implicit roles) on top of gold Abstract Meaning Representations of sentence-level semantics. We present a new corpus of this annotation, with analysis of its quality, alongside a plausible baseline for comparison. It is hoped that this Multi-Sentence AMR corpus (MS-AMR) may become a feasible method for developing rich representations of document meaning, useful for tasks such as information extraction and question answering. Tim O'Gorman, Michael Regan, Kira Griffitt, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Martha Palmer |
COLING | 2 |