Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ryan Yang
dblp:192/9715
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 23% Optimization for machine learning · 23% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PG3: Policy-Guided Planning for Generalized Policy Generation · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PG3: Policy-Guided Planning for Generalized Policy Generation · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score function |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PG3: Policy-Guided Planning for Generalized Policy Generation · IJCAI 2022 |
Distributed systems
distributed coordination |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | HyperPrism: An Adaptive Non-linear Aggregation Framework for Distributed Machine Learning over Non-IID Data and Time-varying Communication Links · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted power mean · 1.5mirror descent · 1.5hypernetwork · 1.5lifted decision list · 0.6PDDL · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | HyperPrism: An Adaptive Non-linear Aggregation Framework for Distributed Machine Learning over Non-IID Data and Time-varying Communication LinksabstractWhile Distributed Machine Learning (DML) has been widely used to achieve decent performance, it is still challenging to take full advantage of data and devices distributed at multiple vantage points to adapt and learn, especially it is non-trivial to address dynamic and divergence challenges based on the linear aggregation framework as follows: (1) heterogeneous learning data at different devices (i.e., non-IID data) resulting in model divergence and (2) in the case of time-varying communication links, the limited ability for devices to reconcile model divergence. In this paper, we contribute a non-linear class aggregation framework HyperPrism that leverages distributed mirror descent with averaging done in the mirror descent dual space and adapts the degree of Weighted Power Mean (WPM) used in each round. Moreover, HyperPrism could adaptively choose different mapping for different layers of the local model with a dedicated hypernetwork per device, achieving automatic optimization of DML in high divergence settings. We perform rigorous analysis and experimental evaluations to demonstrate the effectiveness of adaptive, mirror-mapping DML. In particular, we extend the generalizability of existing related works and position them as special cases within HyperPrism. Our experimental results show that HyperPrism can improve the convergence speed up to 98.63% and scale well to more devices compared with the state-of-the-art, all with little additional computation overhead compared to traditional linear aggregation. Haizhou Du, Yijian Chen, Ryan Yang, Yuchen Li 0006, Linghe Kong |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | PG3: Policy-Guided Planning for Generalized Policy GenerationabstractA longstanding objective in classical planning is to synthesize policies that generalize across multiple problems from the same domain. In this work, we study generalized policy search-based methods with a focus on the score function used to guide the search over policies. We demonstrate limitations of two score functions --- policy evaluation and plan comparison --- and propose a new approach that overcomes these limitations. The main idea behind our approach, Policy-Guided Planning for Generalized Policy Generalization (PG3), is that a candidate policy should be used to guide planning on training problems as a mechanism for evaluating that candidate. Theoretical results in a simplified setting give conditions under which PG3 is optimal or admissible. We then study a specific instantiation of policy search where planning problems are PDDL-based and policies are lifted decision lists. Empirical results in six domains confirm that PG3 learns generalized policies more efficiently and effectively than several baselines. Ryan Yang, Tom Silver, Aidan Curtis, Tomás Lozano-Pérez, Leslie Pack Kaelbling |
IJCAI | 1 |