Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Susana Posada-Céspedes

dblp:193/0253 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-7459-8186ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
viral genomics
0.512021
V-pipe: a computational pipeline for assessing viral genetic diversity from high-throughput data · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
high-throughput sequencing
0.112021
V-pipe: a computational pipeline for assessing viral genetic diversity from high-throughput data · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment
profile hidden markov model alignment
0.112021
V-pipe: a computational pipeline for assessing viral genetic diversity from high-throughput data · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
read mapping
0.112021
V-pipe: a computational pipeline for assessing viral genetic diversity from high-throughput data · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quality control · 0.5profile hidden markov model · 0.5haplotype inference · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 V-pipe: a computational pipeline for assessing viral genetic diversity from high-throughput data
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput sequencing technologies are used increasingly not only in viral genomics research but also in clinical surveillance and diagnostics. These technologies facilitate the assessment of the genetic diversity in intra-host virus populations, which affects transmission, virulence and pathogenesis of viral infections. However, there are two major challenges in analysing viral diversity. First, amplification and sequencing errors confound the identification of true biological variants, and second, the large data volumes represent computational limitations. RESULTS: To support viral high-throughput sequencing studies, we developed V-pipe, a bioinformatics pipeline combining various state-of-the-art statistical models and computational tools for automated end-to-end analyses of raw sequencing reads. V-pipe supports quality control, read mapping and alignment, low-frequency mutation calling, and inference of viral haplotypes. For generating high-quality read alignments, we developed a novel method, called ngshmmalign, based on profile hidden Markov models and tailored to small and highly diverse viral genomes. V-pipe also includes benchmarking functionality providing a standardized environment for comparative evaluations of different pipeline configurations. We demonstrate this capability by assessing the impact of three different read aligners (Bowtie 2, BWA MEM, ngshmmalign) and two different variant callers (LoFreq, ShoRAH) on the performance of calling single-nucleotide variants in intra-host virus populations. V-pipe supports various pipeline configurations and is implemented in a modular fashion to facilitate adaptations to the continuously changing technology landscape. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: V-pipe is freely available at https://github.com/cbg-ethz/V-pipe. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Susana Posada-Céspedes, David Seifert, Ivan Topolsky, Kim Philipp Jablonski, Karin J. Metzner, Niko Beerenwinkel
Bioinform.1
2021 Comparing mutational pathways to lopinavir resistance in HIV-1 subtypes B versus C
abstract
Although combination antiretroviral therapies seem to be effective at controlling HIV-1 infections regardless of the viral subtype, there is increasing evidence for subtype-specific drug resistance mutations. The order and rates at which resistance mutations accumulate in different subtypes also remain poorly understood. Most of this knowledge is derived from studies of subtype B genotypes, despite not being the most abundant subtype worldwide. Here, we present a methodology for the comparison of mutational networks in different HIV-1 subtypes, based on Hidden Conjunctive Bayesian Networks (H-CBN), a probabilistic model for inferring mutational networks from cross-sectional genotype data. We introduce a Monte Carlo sampling scheme for learning H-CBN models for a larger number of resistance mutations and develop a statistical test to assess differences in the inferred mutational networks between two groups. We apply this method to infer the temporal progression of mutations conferring resistance to the protease inhibitor lopinavir in a large cross-sectional cohort of HIV-1 subtype C genotypes from South Africa, as well as to a data set of subtype B genotypes obtained from the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. We find strong support for different initial mutational events in the protease, namely at residue 46 in subtype B and at residue 82 in subtype C. The inferred mutational networks for subtype B versus C are significantly different sharing only five constraints on the order of accumulating mutations with mutation at residue 54 as the parental event. The results also suggest that mutations can accumulate along various alternative paths within subtypes, as opposed to a unique total temporal ordering. Beyond HIV drug resistance, the statistical methodology is applicable more generally for the comparison of inferred mutational networks between any two groups.
Susana Posada-Céspedes, Gert van Zyl, Hesam Montazeri, Jack Kuipers, Soo-Yon Rhee, Roger D. Kouyos, Huldrych F. Günthard, Niko Beerenwinkel
PLoS Comput. Biol.1