Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Erli Wang

dblp:193/5296 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model
0.812024
ACAMDA: Improving Data Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning through Guided Counterfactual Data Augmentation · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.812024
ACAMDA: Improving Data Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning through Guided Counterfactual Data Augmentation · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.812024
ACAMDA: Improving Data Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning through Guided Counterfactual Data Augmentation · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning
0.812024
ACAMDA: Improving Data Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning through Guided Counterfactual Data Augmentation · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

counterfactual estimation · 0.8causal structure recovery · 0.8adversarial learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 ACAMDA: Improving Data Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning through Guided Counterfactual Data Augmentation
abstract
Data augmentation plays a crucial role in improving the data efficiency of reinforcement learning (RL). However, the generation of high-quality augmented data remains a significant challenge. To overcome this, we introduce ACAMDA (Adversarial Causal Modeling for Data Augmentation), a novel framework that integrates two causality-based tasks: causal structure recovery and counterfactual estimation. The unique aspect of ACAMDA lies in its ability to recover temporal causal relationships from limited non-expert datasets. The identification of the sequential cause-and-effect allows the creation of realistic yet unobserved scenarios. We utilize this characteristic to generate guided counterfactual datasets, which, in turn, substantially reduces the need for extensive data collection. By simulating various state-action pairs under hypothetical actions, ACAMDA enriches the training dataset for diverse and heterogeneous conditions. Our experimental evaluation shows that ACAMDA outperforms existing methods, particularly when applied to novel and unseen domains.
Yuewen Sun, Erli Wang, Biwei Huang, Chaochao Lu, Changyin Sun 0001, Kun Zhang 0001
AAAI2
2019 A Hyperspectral Subspace Target Detection Method Based on AMUSE
abstract
Target detection is an important research topic in hyperspectral image processing, and has been the focus of research of many scholars. Compared with many target detection methods, the subspace target detection method is superior. This paper proposes a hyperspectral subspace target detection method LBSE-AMUSE based on the Local Background Subspace Estimation (LBSE) method and the AMUSE algorithm (Algorithm for Multiple Signals Extraction). HyMap airborne hyperspectral remote sensing data is used as the data source, and the performance between the LBSE and LBSE-AMUSE methods is compared by using quantitative indicators such as false alarm rate, detection rate and ROC curve. The experimental results show that the LBSE-AMUSE method has a simple structure, short running time and low false alarm rate compared with the LBSE method, which can suppress the background highlighting target to some extent.
Yani Hou, Wenzhong Zhu, Erli Wang
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell.3