Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kelly P. Stanton
dblp:194/0800
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis |
0.6 | 2 | 2017 | Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks · Bioinform. 2017 Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cytometry data analysis
mass cytometry data analysis |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning · Bioinform. 2017 Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks · Bioinform. 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
deep clustering |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SpectralNet: Spectral Clustering using Deep Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cytometry data analysis
automated gating |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
batch effect correction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cytometry data analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell RNA sequencing
single-cell RNA-seq analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks · Bioinform. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral clustering · 0.3deep neural network · 0.3residual neural network · 0.3maximum mean discrepancy · 0.3domain adaptation · 0.3deep learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | SpectralNet: Spectral Clustering using Deep Neural Networks
Uri Shaham 0001, Kelly P. Stanton, Henry Li, Ronen Basri, Boaz Nadler, Yuval Kluger |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2017 | Gating mass cytometry data by deep learningabstractMOTIVATION: Mass cytometry or CyTOF is an emerging technology for high-dimensional multiparameter single cell analysis that overcomes many limitations of fluorescence-based flow cytometry. New methods for analyzing CyTOF data attempt to improve automation, scalability, performance and interpretation of data generated in large studies. Assigning individual cells into discrete groups of cell types (gating) involves time-consuming sequential manual steps, untenable for larger studies. RESULTS: We introduce DeepCyTOF, a standardization approach for gating, based on deep learning techniques. DeepCyTOF requires labeled cells from only a single sample. It is based on domain adaptation principles and is a generalization of previous work that allows us to calibrate between a target distribution and a source distribution in an unsupervised manner. We show that DeepCyTOF is highly concordant (98%) with cell classification obtained by individual manual gating of each sample when applied to a collection of 16 biological replicates of primary immune blood cells, even when measured across several instruments. Further, DeepCyTOF achieves very high accuracy on the semi-automated gating challenge of the FlowCAP-I competition as well as two CyTOF datasets generated from primary immune blood cells: (i) 14 subjects with a history of infection with West Nile virus (WNV), (ii) 34 healthy subjects of different ages. We conclude that deep learning in general, and DeepCyTOF specifically, offers a powerful computational approach for semi-automated gating of CyTOF and flow cytometry data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our codes and data are publicly available at https://github.com/KlugerLab/deepcytof.git. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Huamin Li, Uri Shaham 0001, Kelly P. Stanton, Ruth R. Montgomery, Yuval Kluger |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2017 | Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networksabstractMOTIVATION: Sources of variability in experimentally derived data include measurement error in addition to the physical phenomena of interest. This measurement error is a combination of systematic components, originating from the measuring instrument and random measurement errors. Several novel biological technologies, such as mass cytometry and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), are plagued with systematic errors that may severely affect statistical analysis if the data are not properly calibrated. RESULTS: We propose a novel deep learning approach for removing systematic batch effects. Our method is based on a residual neural network, trained to minimize the Maximum Mean Discrepancy between the multivariate distributions of two replicates, measured in different batches. We apply our method to mass cytometry and scRNA-seq datasets, and demonstrate that it effectively attenuates batch effects. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: our codes and data are publicly available at https://github.com/ushaham/BatchEffectRemoval.git. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Uri Shaham 0001, Kelly P. Stanton, Huamin Li, Khadir Raddassi, Ruth R. Montgomery, Yuval Kluger |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2017 | Algorithm 971: An Implementation of a Randomized Algorithm for Principal Component AnalysisabstractRecent years have witnessed intense development of randomized methods for low-rank approximation. These methods target principal component analysis and the calculation of truncated singular value decompositions. The present article presents an essentially black-box, foolproof implementation for Mathworks' MATLAB, a popular software platform for numerical computation. As illustrated via several tests, the randomized algorithms for low-rank approximation outperform or at least match the classical deterministic techniques (such as Lanczos iterations run to convergence) in basically all respects: accuracy, computational efficiency (both speed and memory usage), ease-of-use, parallelizability, and reliability. However, the classical procedures remain the methods of choice for estimating spectral norms and are far superior for calculating the least singular values and corresponding singular vectors (or singular subspaces). Huamin Li, George C. Linderman, Arthur Szlam, Kelly P. Stanton, Yuval Kluger, Mark Tygert |
ACM Trans. Math. Softw. | 4 |