Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aaron Sarna
dblp:194/2426
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8786-5581ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
3D vision · 52% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% Generative modeling · 17% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 67% Visual content generation and editing · 26% Computational photography and imaging · 8% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Local Deep Implicit Functions for 3D Shape · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape representation
implicit function |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Local Deep Implicit Functions for 3D Shape · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
supervised contrastive learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
surface reconstruction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Local Deep Implicit Functions for 3D Shape · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image editing
image extrapolation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Extension · ICCV 2019 |
Visual content generation and editing
image editing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Extension · ICCV 2019 |
Geometric modeling and processing
implicit surface |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Shape Templates With Structured Implicit Functions · ICCV 2019 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Shape Templates With Structured Implicit Functions · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d face reconstruction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Unsupervised Training for 3D Morphable Model Regression · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d face modeling
3d morphable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Unsupervised Training for 3D Morphable Model Regression · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
face synthesis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Synthesizing Normalized Faces from Facial Identity Features · CVPR 2017 |
Computational photography and imaging › panoramic imaging
panorama generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Extension · ICCV 2019 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Shape Templates With Structured Implicit Functions · ICCV 2019 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape correspondence |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Shape Templates With Structured Implicit Functions · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Synthesizing Normalized Faces from Facial Identity Features · CVPR 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structured implicit functions · 0.8semantic conditioning · 0.8neural network · 0.8generative adversarial network · 0.8depth images · 0.4deep implicit function · 0.4contrastive loss · 0.4unsupervised learning · 0.3regression network · 0.3differentiable rendering · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Contrail Detection on GOES-16 ABI With the OpenContrails DatasetabstractContrails (condensation trails) are line-shaped ice clouds caused by aircraft and are a substantial contributor to aviation-induced climate change. Contrail avoidance is potentially an inexpensive way to significantly reduce the climate impact of aviation. An automated contrail detection system is an essential tool to develop and evaluate contrail avoidance systems. In this article, we present a human-labeled dataset named OpenContrails to train and evaluate contrail detection models based on GOES-16 Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) data. We propose and evaluate a contrail detection model that incorporates temporal context for improved detection accuracy. The human labeled dataset and the contrail detection outputs are publicly available on Google Cloud Storage atgs://goes_contrails_dataset. Joe Yue-Hei Ng, Kevin McCloskey, Jian Cui 0002, Vincent R. Meijer, Erica Brand, Aaron Sarna, Nita Goyal, Christopher Van Arsdale, Scott Geraedts |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 6 |
| 2020 | Local Deep Implicit Functions for 3D ShapeabstractThe goal of this project is to learn a 3D shape representation that enables accurate surface reconstruction, compact storage, efficient computation, consistency for similar shapes, generalization across diverse shape categories, and inference from depth camera observations. Towards this end, we introduce Local Deep Implicit Functions (LDIF), a 3D shape representation that decomposes space into a structured set of learned implicit functions. We provide networks that infer the space decomposition and local deep implicit functions from a 3D mesh or posed depth image. During experiments, we find that it provides 10.3 points higher surface reconstruction accuracy (F-Score) than the state-of-the-art (OccNet), while requiring fewer than 1\% of the network parameters. Experiments on posed depth image completion and generalization to unseen classes show 15.8 and 17.8 point improvements over the state-of-the-art, while producing a structured 3D representation for each input with consistency across diverse shape collections. Kyle Genova, Forrester Cole, Avneesh Sud, Aaron Sarna, Thomas A. Funkhouser |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2020 | Supervised Contrastive LearningabstractContrastive learning applied to self-supervised representation learning has seen a resurgence in recent years, leading to state of the art performance in the unsupervised training of deep image models. Modern batch contrastive approaches subsume or significantly outperform traditional contrastive losses such as triplet, max-margin and the N-pairs loss. In this work, we extend the self-supervised batch contrastive approach to the fully-supervised setting, allowing us to effectively leverage label information. Clusters of points belonging to the same class are pulled together in embedding space, while simultaneously pushing apart clusters of samples from different classes. We analyze two possible versions of the supervised contrastive (SupCon) loss, identifying the best-performing formulation of the loss. On ResNet-200, we achieve top-1 accuracy of 81.4% on the ImageNet dataset, which is 0.8% above the best number reported for this architecture. We show consistent outperformance over cross-entropy on other datasets and two ResNet variants. The loss shows benefits for robustness to natural corruptions, and is more stable to hyperparameter settings such as optimizers and data augmentations. In reduced data settings, it outperforms cross-entropy significantly. Our loss function is simple to implement and reference TensorFlow code is released at https://t.ly/supcon. Prannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang 0050, Aaron Sarna, Yonglong Tian, Phillip Isola, Aaron Maschinot, Ce Liu 0001, Dilip Krishnan |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2019 | Learning Shape Templates With Structured Implicit FunctionsabstractTemplate 3D shapes are useful for many tasks in graphics and vision, including fitting observation data, analyzing shape collections, and transferring shape attributes. Because of the variety of geometry and topology of real-world shapes, previous methods generally use a library of hand-made templates. In this paper, we investigate learning a general shape template from data. To allow for widely varying geometry and topology, we choose an implicit surface representation based on composition of local shape elements. While long known to computer graphics, this representation has not yet been explored in the context of machine learning for vision. We show that structured implicit functions are suitable for learning and allow a network to smoothly and simultaneously fit multiple classes of shapes. The learned shape template supports applications such as shape exploration, correspondence, abstraction, interpolation, and semantic segmentation from an RGB image. Kyle Genova, Forrester Cole, Daniel Vlasic, Aaron Sarna, William T. Freeman, Thomas A. Funkhouser |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2019 | Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image ExtensionabstractImage extension models have broad applications in image editing, computational photography and computer graphics. While image inpainting has been extensively studied in the literature, it is challenging to directly apply the state-of-the-art inpainting methods to image extension as they tend to generate blurry or repetitive pixels with inconsistent semantics. We introduce semantic conditioning to the discriminator of a generative adversarial network (GAN), and achieve strong results on image extension with coherent semantics and visually pleasing colors and textures. We also show promising results in extreme extensions, such as panorama generation. Dilip Krishnan, Piotr Teterwak, Aaron Sarna, Aaron Maschinot, Ce Liu 0001, David Belanger 0002, William T. Freeman |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2018 | Unsupervised Training for 3D Morphable Model RegressionabstractWe present a method for training a regression network from image pixels to 3D morphable model coordinates using only unlabeled photographs. The training loss is based on features from a facial recognition network, computed on-the-fly by rendering the predicted faces with a differentiable renderer. To make training from features feasible and avoid network fooling effects, we introduce three objectives: a batch distribution loss that encourages the output distribution to match the distribution of the morphable model, a loopback loss that ensures the network can correctly reinterpret its own output, and a multi-view identity loss that compares the features of the predicted 3D face and the input photograph from multiple viewing angles. We train a regression network using these objectives, a set of unlabeled photographs, and the morphable model itself, and demonstrate state-of-the-art results. Kyle Genova, Forrester Cole, Aaron Maschinot, Aaron Sarna, Daniel Vlasic, William T. Freeman |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2017 | Synthesizing Normalized Faces from Facial Identity FeaturesabstractWe present a method for synthesizing a frontal, neutral-expression image of a person's face given an input face photograph. This is achieved by learning to generate facial landmarks and textures from features extracted from a facial-recognition network. Unlike previous generative approaches, our encoding feature vector is largely invariant to lighting, pose, and facial expression. Exploiting this invariance, we train our decoder network using only frontal, neutral-expression photographs. Since these photographs are well aligned, we can decompose them into a sparse set of landmark points and aligned texture maps. The decoder then predicts landmarks and textures independently and combines them using a differentiable image warping operation. The resulting images can be usedfor a number of applications, such as analyzing facial attributes, exposure and white balance adjustment, or creating a 3-D avatar. Forrester Cole, David Belanger 0002, Dilip Krishnan, Aaron Sarna, Inbar Mosseri, William T. Freeman |
CVPR | 4 |