Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tushar Choudhary
dblp:194/2806
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 77% Vision and language · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Talk2BEV: Language-enhanced Bird's-eye View Maps for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
visual spatial reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Talk2BEV: Language-enhanced Bird's-eye View Maps for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large vision-language model · 0.8bird's eye view mapping · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Talk2BEV: Language-enhanced Bird's-eye View Maps for Autonomous DrivingabstractThis work introduces Talk2BEV, a large vision-language model (LVLM)1interface for bird’s-eye view (BEV) maps commonly used in autonomous driving. While existing perception systems for autonomous driving scenarios have largely focused on a pre-defined (closed) set of object categories and driving scenarios, Talk2BEV eliminates the need for BEV-specific training, relying instead on well-performing pre-trained LVLMs. This enables a single system to cater to a variety of autonomous driving tasks encompassing visual and spatial reasoning, predicting the intents of traffic actors, and decision-making based on visual cues. We extensively evaluate Talk2BEV on a large number of scene understanding tasks that rely on both the ability to interpret freeform natural language queries, and in grounding these queries to the visual context embedded into the language-enhanced BEV map. To enable further research in LVLMs for autonomous driving scenarios, we develop and release Talk2BEV-Bench, a benchmark encompassing 1000 human-annotated BEV scenarios, with more than 20,000 questions and ground-truth responses from the NuScenes dataset. We encourage the reader to view the demos on our project page: https://llmbev.github.io/talk2bev/ Tushar Choudhary, Vikrant Dewangan, Shivam Chandhok, Shubham Priyadarshan, Anushka Jain, Arun Kumar Singh 0001, Siddharth Srivastava 0004, Krishna Murthy Jatavallabhula, K. Madhava Krishna |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | LeGo-Drive: Language-enhanced Goal-oriented Closed-Loop End-to-End Autonomous DrivingabstractExisting Vision-Language Models (VLMs) produce long-term trajectory waypoints or directly control actions based on their perception input and language prompt. However, these VLMs are not explicitly aware of the constraints imposed by the scene or kinematics of the vehicle. As a result, the generated trajectories or control inputs are likely to be unsafe and/or infeasible. In this paper, we introduce LeGo-Drive†, which aims to address these issues. Our key idea is to use the VLM to just predict a goal location based on the given language command and perception input, which is then fed to a downstream differentiable trajectory optimizer with learnable components. We train the VLM and the trajectory optimizer in an end-to-end fashion using a loss function that captures the ego-vehicle’s ability to reach the predicted goal while satisfying safety and kinematic constraints. The gradients during the back-propagation flow through the optimization layer and make the VLM aware of the planner’s capabilities, making more feasible goal predictions. We compare our end-to-end approach with a decoupled framework where the planner is just used at the inference time to drive to the VLM-predicted goal location and report a goal reaching Success Rate of 81%. We demonstrate the versatility of LeGo-Drive†across various driving scenarios and navigation commands, highlighting its potential for practical deployment in autonomous vehicles. Pranjal Paul, Anant Garg, Tushar Choudhary, Arun Kumar Singh 0001, K. Madhava Krishna |
IROS | 3 |