EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rosemary Karr
dblp:194/3813
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
interface evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | Evaluating the "friendliness" of a timesharing system · CHI (2) 1981 |
Operating systems › resource management › process management › multiprogramming
time-sharing systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | Evaluating the "friendliness" of a timesharing system · CHI (2) 1981 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
evaluation methodology · 0.0case study · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | Evaluating the "friendliness" of a timesharing systemabstractThe decade of the Sixties served to introduce most university campuses to the computer; the Seventies brought the computer, via a terminal, into every facet of university life. Computing in the Eighties will cause every university and college to evaluate and reconsider its exploitation of modern computing equipment for education and research.For example, at Northwestern University, it was recognized that continued growth in timesharing would be a major factor in computing at NU in the 1980s and that this growth would come from a large community of new users and of casual users. In January 1980, the Computing Center began a long-range planning study. A five-year equipment enhancement and replacement plan was to be developed which was intended to reverse an unsatisfactory trend toward computer saturation, to further improve and modernize our computer offerings, and to ensure that NU remained on a path of excellence in computing. Since time-sharing had already increased to over 50% of the total usage of the computer, a decision was made to begin the evaluation of modern timesharing systems, with special emphasis in two areas: 1) efficiency and reliability, and 2) the user interface.This paper describes the processes which were developed and used for the evaluation of the user interface, or as it came to be known, the "friendliness" study [1]. Lorraine Borman, Rosemary Karr |
CHI (2) | 2 |