Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dickson Chow

dblp:194/4236 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 67% Data mining · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › text analysis › stylometry
authorship attribution
0.212016
A Scalable Framework for Stylometric Analysis Query Processing · ICDM 2016
Data mining › similarity computation
set similarity
0.212016
A Scalable Framework for Stylometric Analysis Query Processing · ICDM 2016
Information retrieval › text analysis
stylometry
0.212016
A Scalable Framework for Stylometric Analysis Query Processing · ICDM 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

set similarity search · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 A Scalable Framework for Stylometric Analysis Query Processing
abstract
Stylometry is the statistical analyses of variationsin the author's literary style. The technique has been used inmany linguistic analysis applications, such as, author profiling, authorship identification, and authorship verification. Over thepast two decades, authorship identification has been extensivelystudied by researchers in the area of natural language processing. However, these studies are generally limited to (i) a small number of candidate authors, and (ii) documents with similar lengths. In this paper, we propose a novel solution by modeling authorship attribution as a set similarity problem to overcome the two stated limitations. We conducted extensive experimental studies on a real dataset collected from an online book archive, Project Gutenberg. Experimental results show that in comparison to existing stylometry studies, our proposed solution can handlea larger number of documents of different lengths written by alarger pool of candidate authors with a high accuracy.
Sarana Nutanong, Chenyun Yu, Raheem Sarwar, Weiliang Xu 0001, Dickson Chow
ICDM5