Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhengshen Jiang

dblp:194/4873 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 83% Data mining · 17%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 87% Efficient and distributed learning · 13%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › graph-based recommendation
heterogeneous information network recommendation
0.312018
Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networks Based on Generalized Random Walk Model and Bayesian Personalized Ranking · WSDM 2018
Recommender systems › graph-based recommendation
random walk recommendation
0.312018
Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networks Based on Generalized Random Walk Model and Bayesian Personalized Ranking · WSDM 2018
Recommender systems
tag recommendation
0.312018
Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networks Based on Generalized Random Walk Model and Bayesian Personalized Ranking · WSDM 2018
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.312017
Generalized Ambiguity Decompositions for Classification with Applications in Active Learning and Unsupervised Ensemble Pruning · AAAI 2017
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
ensemble pruning
0.312017
Generalized Ambiguity Decompositions for Classification with Applications in Active Learning and Unsupervised Ensemble Pruning · AAAI 2017
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.112018
Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networks Based on Generalized Random Walk Model and Bayesian Personalized Ranking · WSDM 2018
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
heterogeneous information network
0.112018
Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networks Based on Generalized Random Walk Model and Bayesian Personalized Ranking · WSDM 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.112017
Generalized Ambiguity Decompositions for Classification with Applications in Active Learning and Unsupervised Ensemble Pruning · AAAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random walk with restart · 0.3bayesian personalized ranking · 0.3bias-variance-covariance decomposition · 0.3ambiguity decomposition · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 User preference modeling based on meta paths and diversity regularization in heterogeneous information networks
Hongzhi Liu 0001, Zhengshen Jiang, Yang Song 0021, Tao Zhang 0070, Zhonghai Wu
Knowl. Based Syst.2
2018 Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networks Based on Generalized Random Walk Model and Bayesian Personalized Ranking
abstract
Recommendation based on heterogeneous information network(HIN) is attracting more and more attention due to its ability to emulate collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, context-aware recommendation and combinations of any of these recommendation semantics. Random walk based methods are usually used to mine the paths, weigh the paths, and compute the closeness or relevance between two nodes in a HIN. A key for the success of these methods is how to properly set the weights of links in a HIN. In existing methods, the weights of links are mostly set heuristically. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian Personalized Ranking(BPR) based machine learning method, called HeteLearn, to learn the weights of links in a HIN. In order to model user preferences for personalized recommendation, we also propose a generalized random walk with restart model on HINs. We evaluate the proposed method in a personalized recommendation task and a tag recommendation task. Experimental results show that our method performs significantly better than both the traditional collaborative filtering and the state-of-the-art HIN-based recommendation methods.
Zhengshen Jiang, Hongzhi Liu 0001, Zhonghai Wu, Tao Zhang 0070
WSDM1
2017 Generalized Ambiguity Decompositions for Classification with Applications in Active Learning and Unsupervised Ensemble Pruning
abstract
Error decomposition analysis is a key problem for ensemble learning. Two commonly used error decomposition schemes, the classic Ambiguity Decomposition and Bias-Variance-Covariance decomposition, are only suitable for regression tasks with square loss. We generalized the classic Ambiguity Decomposition from regression problems with square loss to classification problems with any loss functions that are twice differentiable, including the logistic loss in Logistic Regression, the exponential loss in Boosting methods, and the 0-1 loss in many other classification tasks. We further proved several important properties of the Ambiguity term, armed with which the Ambiguity terms of logistic loss, exponential loss and 0-1 loss can be explicitly computed and optimized. We further discussed the relationship between margin theory, "good'' and "bad'' diversity theory and our theoretical results, and provided some new insights for ensemble learning. We demonstrated the applications of our theoretical results in active learning and unsupervised ensemble pruning, and the experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of our methods.
Zhengshen Jiang, Hongzhi Liu 0001, Zhonghai Wu
AAAI1