Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Erman Yafay

dblp:194/5062 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0006-8400-1351ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression
document reordering
0.712023
Faster Dynamic Pruning via Reordering of Documents in Inverted Indexes · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › query processing
dynamic pruning
0.712023
Faster Dynamic Pruning via Reordering of Documents in Inverted Indexes · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › indexing
inverted index
0.712023
Faster Dynamic Pruning via Reordering of Documents in Inverted Indexes · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval
query processing
0.712023
Faster Dynamic Pruning via Reordering of Documents in Inverted Indexes · SIGIR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maxscore · 0.7WAND · 0.7BMW · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Faster Dynamic Pruning via Reordering of Documents in Inverted Indexes
abstract
Widely used dynamic pruning algorithms (such as MaxScore, WAND and BMW) keep track of the k-th highest score (i.e., heap threshold) among the documents that are scored so far, to avoid scoring the documents that cannot get into the top-k result list. Obviously, the faster the heap threshold converges to its final value, the larger will be the number of skipped documents and hence, the efficiency gains of the pruning algorithms. In this paper, we tailor approaches that reorder the documents in the inverted index based on their access counts and ranks for previous queries. By storing such frequently retrieved documents at front of the postings lists, we aim to compute the heap threshold earlier during the query processing. Our approach yields substantial speedups (up to 1.33x) for all three dynamic pruning algorithms and outperforms two strong baselines that have been employed for document reordering in the literature.
Erman Yafay, Ismail Sengör Altingövde
SIGIR1
2019 Caching Scores for Faster Query Processing with Dynamic Pruning in Search Engines
abstract
We propose to use a score cache, which stores the score of the k-th result of a query, to accelerate top-k query processing with dynamic pruning methods (i.e., WAND and BMW). We introduce heuristics that, for a new query, generate its subsets and probe the score cache to obtain a lower-bound on its score threshold. Our experiments show up to 8.6% savings in mean processing time for the queries that are not seen before, i.e., cannot benefit from a result cache.
Erman Yafay, Ismail Sengör Altingövde
CIKM1
2019 On the Impact of Storing Query Frequency History for Search Engine Result Caching
Erman Yafay, Ismail Sengör Altingövde
ECIR (2)1