Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anderson C. Sant'Ana

dblp:194/7198 · also Anderson Camargo Sant'Ana · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 30% Cloud and datacenter computing · 30% Parallel and multicore computing · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
dynamic resource management
0.412020
Modular and Distributed Management of Many-Core SoCs · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2020
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
many-core architecture
0.412020
Modular and Distributed Management of Many-Core SoCs · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2020
Parallel and multicore computing
task allocation
0.412020
Modular and Distributed Management of Many-Core SoCs · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2020
Distributed systems
distributed management
0.112020
Modular and Distributed Management of Many-Core SoCs · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed management paradigms · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Modular and Distributed Management of Many-Core SoCs
abstract
Many-Core Systems-on-Chip increasingly require Dynamic Multi-objective Management (DMOM) of resources. DMOM uses different management components for objectives and resources to implement comprehensive and self-adaptive system resource management. DMOMs are challenging because they require a scalable and well-organized framework to make each component modular, allowing it to be instantiated or redesigned with a limited impact on other components. This work evaluates two state-of-the-art distributed management paradigms and, motivated by their drawbacks, proposes a new one called Management Application (MA) , along with a DMOM framework based on MA. MA is a distributed application, specific for management, where each task implements a management role. This paradigm favors scalability and modularity because the management design assumes different and parallel modules, decoupled from the OS. An experiment with a task mapping case study shows that MA reduces the overhead of management resources (-61.5%), latency (-66%), and communication volume (-96%) compared to state-of-the-art per-application management. Compared to cluster-based management (CBM) implemented directly as part of the OS, MA is similar in resources and communication volume, increasing only the mapping latency (+16%). Results targeting a complete DMOM control loop addressing up to three different objectives show the scalability regarding system size and adaptation frequency compared to CBM, presenting an overall management latency reduction of 17.2% and an overall monitoring messages’ latency reduction of 90.2%.
Marcelo Ruaro, Anderson C. Sant'Ana, Axel Jantsch, Fernando Gehm Moraes
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.2
2017 Runtime energy management under real-time constraints in MPSoCs
abstract
The workload of many-core systems includes real-time (RT) applications. Obtain energy savings while executing RT applications is a challenge due to the RT timing constraints. The techniques used to reduce the consumption, as dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS), usually delays the applications, leading to constraint violations. Most works in the literature ensure RT constraints based on design-time analysis of the expected workload by defining the voltage and frequency levels. Our main contribution is the proposal of a Runtime Energy Management for RT applications (RT-REM), using monitored data, and DVFS and task mapping as actuation policies. Supervising the application slack time enables to save energy of RT applications. Evaluations on many-core systems (up to 144 PEs), achieves 18% in energy savings, keeping constraint misses below 2.5%. Our proposal stands out from related works regarding scalability, realistic and accurate energy estimation, and absence of design-time analysis of the application set.
Andre L. M. Martins, Marcelo Ruaro, Anderson C. Sant'Ana, Fernando Gehm Moraes
ISCAS3