Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luigi Arena

dblp:194/8964 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding
graphics coding
0.011980
Coordinates Versus Sequential Facsimile · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Image and video coding › lossless compression
run-length coding
0.011980
Coordinates Versus Sequential Facsimile · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Coding theory › source coding › source modeling
markov sources
0.011980
Coordinates Versus Sequential Facsimile · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Coding theory
source coding
0.011980
Coordinates Versus Sequential Facsimile · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

isoentropic encoding · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1980 Coordinates Versus Sequential Facsimile
abstract
The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate the improvement that can be obtained, in the coding of graphics, by using more sophisticated encoding schemes than run-length. These schemes are now well within the reach of today's technology. In the broad class of encoders by coordinates, three isoentropic encoding schemes are considered: 1) encoding of isolated points, 2) encoding of unidimensional patterns, 3) encoding of two-dimensional patterns. Although the three systems are all conceptually straightforward, they require an increasing complexity of encoding-decoding operations. This complexity is balanced, however, by a larger compression factor for the more complex schemes. The results obtained with these encoding schemes are finally compared to those of a run-length coding scheme for the case of a first-order Markov model of the source.
Luigi Arena
IEEE Trans. Commun.1