Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christine Chu

dblp:194/9686 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 56% Design research and methods · 44%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.312017
When Subjects Interpret the Data: Social Media Non-use as a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW · CSCW 2017
Design research and methods
research methodology
0.312017
When Subjects Interpret the Data: Social Media Non-use as a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW · CSCW 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.6member checking · 0.6delphi method · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 When Subjects Interpret the Data: Social Media Non-use as a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW
abstract
This paper describes the use of the Delphi method as a means of incorporating study participants into the processes of data analysis and interpretation.As a case study, it focuses on perceptions about use and non-use of the social media site Facebook.The work presented here involves three phases.First, a large survey included both a demographically representative sample and a convenience sample.Second, a smaller follow-up survey presented results from that survey back to survey respondents.Third, a series of qualitative member checking interviews with additional survey respondents served to validate the findings of the follow-up survey.This paper demonstrates the utility of Delphi by highlighting the ways that it enables us to synthesize across these three study phases, advancing understanding of perceptions about social media use and non-use.The paper concludes by discussing the broader applicability of the Delphi method across CSCW research.
Eric P. S. Baumer, Christine Chu, Shion Guha, Geri Gay
CSCW3