Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kent Gauen
dblp:195/4143 · also Kent W. Gauen
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 85% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 15% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian-Inspired Space-Time Superpixels · ICCV 2025 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
superpixel segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian-Inspired Space-Time Superpixels · ICCV 2025 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation › superpixel segmentation
temporal superpixel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian-Inspired Space-Time Superpixels · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Soft Superpixel Neighborhood Attention · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
local attention |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Soft Superpixel Neighborhood Attention · NeurIPS 2024 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Soft Superpixel Neighborhood Attention · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian-Inspired Space-Time Superpixels · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian inference · 1.7superpixel segmentation · 1.5soft attention · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bayesian-Inspired Space-Time Superpixels
Kent Gauen, Stanley H. Chan |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2024 | Soft Superpixel Neighborhood AttentionabstractImages contain objects with deformable boundaries, such as the contours of a human face, yet attention operators act on square windows. This mixes features from perceptually unrelated regions, which can degrade the quality of a denoiser. One can exclude pixels using an estimate of perceptual groupings, such as superpixels, but the naive use of superpixels can be theoretically and empirically worse than standard attention. Using superpixel probabilities rather than superpixel assignments, this paper proposes soft superpixel neighborhood attention (SNA), which interpolates between the existing neighborhood attention and the naive superpixel neighborhood attention. This paper presents theoretical results showing SNA is the optimal denoiser under a latent superpixel model. SNA outperforms alternative local attention modules on image denoising, and we compare the superpixels learned from denoising with those learned with supervision. Kent Gauen, Stanley H. Chan |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Three years of low-power image recognition challenge: Introduction to special sessionabstractReducing power consumption has been one of the most important goals since the creation of electronic systems. Energy efficiency is increasingly important as battery-powered systems (such as smartphones, drones, and body cameras) are widely used. It is desirable using the on-board computers to recognize objects in the images captured by these cameras. The Low-Power Image Recognition Challenge (LPIRC) is an annual competition started in 2015. The special session includes presentations given by the winners of the first three years of LPIRC. This paper explains the rules of the competition and the rationale, summarizes the teams' scores, and describes the lessons learned in the first three years. The paper suggests possible improvements of future challenges. Kent Gauen, Ryan Dailey, Yung-Hsiang Lu, Eunbyung Park, Wei Liu 0015, Alexander C. Berg, Yiran Chen 0001 |
DATE | 1 |
| 2017 | Low-power image recognition challengeabstractSignificant progress has been made in recent years using computer programs recognizing objects in images. Meanwhile, many cameras are embedded in battery-powered systems (such as mobile phones, wearable devices, and drones) and energy efficiency is essential. Even though many research papers have been published on the topics related to low power and image recognition, there does not exist a common metric for comparing different solutions in terms of (1) energy efficiency and (2) accuracy in recognition. Low-Power Image Recognition Challenge (LPIRC) is, to our knowledge, the only on-site competition that considers both energy consumption and recognition accuracy. LPIRC was held as one-day workshops in the Design Automation Conference in 2015 and 2016. Each participating team brought their own system to the workshops. The referee system of LPIRC includes (1) an intranet, (2) a power meter, and (3) an HTTP server that provided the images and accepted the answers from the contestants' systems. The scores were the ratio of recognition accuracy and the energy consumption. The winner of 2016 was able to analyze 7,347 images and achieve 9.44% normalized mAP (mean average precision) with average power consumption of 4.7 W. Another team analyzed 1,020 images and achieved 25.7% normalized mAP. Kent Gauen, Rohit Rangan, Anup Mohan, Yung-Hsiang Lu, Wei Liu 0015, Alexander C. Berg |
ASP-DAC | 1 |
| 2017 | Internet of video things in 2030: A world with many camerasabstractThe Internet of Things (IoT) is the internetworking of a variety of devices, including sensors. Among all sensors, visual sensors (i.e. cameras) are special because they can provide rich and versatile information. The world already has more than one billion cameras on mobile phones. We define the internet-working of visual sensors as the Internet of Video Things. This article estimates the number of cameras the world will see in 2030 and the implications of a large number of cameras. Transmitting, storing, and analyzing the data from cameras could impose significant challenges to existing technological infrastructures. This paper surveys recent progress in relevant technologies and suggests directions for future research. Anup Mohan, Kent Gauen, Yung-Hsiang Lu, Wei Wayne Li, Xuemin Chen |
ISCAS | 2 |