Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dieterich Lawson
dblp:195/5919
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 81% Optimization for machine learning · 9% Trustworthy machine learning · 6% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
1.6 | 3 | 2023 | NAS-X: Neural Adaptive Smoothing via Twisting · NeurIPS 2023 SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted Objectives · NeurIPS 2022 Energy-Inspired Models: Learning with Sampler-Induced Distributions · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
1.6 | 3 | 2023 | NAS-X: Neural Adaptive Smoothing via Twisting · NeurIPS 2023 SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted Objectives · NeurIPS 2022 Doubly Reparameterized Gradient Estimators for Monte Carlo Objectives · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
1.3 | 3 | 2023 | NAS-X: Neural Adaptive Smoothing via Twisting · NeurIPS 2023 SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted Objectives · NeurIPS 2022 Filtering Variational Objectives · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
1.2 | 3 | 2023 | NAS-X: Neural Adaptive Smoothing via Twisting · NeurIPS 2023 REBAR: Low-variance, unbiased gradient estimates for discrete latent variable models · NIPS 2017 Filtering Variational Objectives · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
sequential latent variable model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | NAS-X: Neural Adaptive Smoothing via Twisting · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted Objectives · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Neural Testbed: Evaluating Joint Predictions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Energy-Inspired Models: Learning with Sampler-Induced Distributions · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › variational objective
evidence lower bound |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Energy-Inspired Models: Learning with Sampler-Induced Distributions · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimator |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Doubly Reparameterized Gradient Estimators for Monte Carlo Objectives · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
control variates |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | REBAR: Low-variance, unbiased gradient estimates for discrete latent variable models · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
discrete latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | REBAR: Low-variance, unbiased gradient estimates for discrete latent variable models · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | REBAR: Low-variance, unbiased gradient estimates for discrete latent variable models · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | REBAR: Low-variance, unbiased gradient estimates for discrete latent variable models · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
variational objective |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Filtering Variational Objectives · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › sequential monte carlo
particle filtering |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Filtering Variational Objectives · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reparameterization · 0.7twisting · 0.7smoothing sequential monte carlo · 0.7reweighted wake-sleep · 0.7variational objective · 0.6sequential monte carlo · 0.6neural network data generating process · 0.6density ratio estimation · 0.6bayesian deep learning · 0.6doubly reparameterized gradient estimator · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | NAS-X: Neural Adaptive Smoothing via TwistingabstractSequential latent variable models (SLVMs) are essential tools in statistics and machine learning, with applications ranging from healthcare to neuroscience. As their flexibility increases, analytic inference and model learning can become challenging, necessitating approximate methods. Here we introduce neural adaptive smoothing via twisting (NAS-X), a method that extends reweighted wake-sleep (RWS) to the sequential setting by using smoothing sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) to estimate intractable posterior expectations. Combining RWS and smoothing SMC allows NAS-X to provide low-bias and low-variance gradient estimates, and fit both discrete and continuous latent variable models. We illustrate the theoretical advantages of NAS-X over previous methods and explore these advantages empirically in a variety of tasks, including a challenging application to mechanistic models of neuronal dynamics. These experiments show that NAS-X substantially outperforms previous VI- and RWS-based methods in inference and model learning, achieving lower parameter error and tighter likelihood bounds. Dieterich Lawson, Michael Li, Scott W. Linderman |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted ObjectivesabstractSequential Monte Carlo (SMC) is an inference algorithm for state space models that approximates the posterior by sampling from a sequence of target distributions. The target distributions are often chosen to be the filtering distributions, but these ignore information from future observations, leading to practical and theoretical limitations in inference and model learning. We introduce SIXO, a method that instead learns target distributions that approximate the smoothing distributions, incorporating information from all observations. The key idea is to use density ratio estimation to fit functions that warp the filtering distributions into the smoothing distributions. We then use SMC with these learned targets to define a variational objective for model and proposal learning. SIXO yields provably tighter log marginal lower bounds and offers more accurate posterior inferences and parameter estimates in a variety of domains. Dieterich Lawson, Allan Raventós, Andrew Warrington, Scott W. Linderman |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | The Neural Testbed: Evaluating Joint PredictionsabstractPredictive distributions quantify uncertainties ignored by point estimates. This paper introduces The Neural Testbed: an open source benchmark for controlled and principled evaluation of agents that generate such predictions. Crucially, the testbed assesses agents not only on the quality of their marginal predictions per input, but also on their joint predictions across many inputs. We evaluate a range of agents using a simple neural network data generating process.Our results indicate that some popular Bayesian deep learning agents do not fare well with joint predictions, even when they can produce accurate marginal predictions. We also show that the quality of joint predictions drives performance in downstream decision tasks. We find these results are robust across choice a wide range of generative models, and highlight the practical importance of joint predictions to the community. Ian Osband, Zheng Wen 0002, Seyed Mohammad Asghari, Vikranth Reddy Dwaracherla, Xiuyuan Lu, Morteza Ibrahimi, Dieterich Lawson, Botao Hao, Brendan O'Donoghue, Benjamin Van Roy |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2019 | Doubly Reparameterized Gradient Estimators for Monte Carlo Objectives
George Tucker, Dieterich Lawson, Shixiang Gu, Chris J. Maddison |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2019 | Energy-Inspired Models: Learning with Sampler-Induced DistributionsabstractEnergy-based models (EBMs) are powerful probabilistic models, but suffer from intractable sampling and density evaluation due to the partition function. As a result, inference in EBMs relies on approximate sampling algorithms, leading to a mismatch between the model and inference. Motivated by this, we consider the sampler-induced distribution as the model of interest and maximize the likelihood of this model. This yields a class of energy-inspired models (EIMs) that incorporate learned energy functions while still providing exact samples and tractable log-likelihood lower bounds. We describe and evaluate three instantiations of such models based on truncated rejection sampling, self-normalized importance sampling, and Hamiltonian importance sampling. These models out-perform or perform comparably to the recently proposed Learned Accept/RejectSampling algorithm and provide new insights on ranking Noise Contrastive Estimation and Contrastive Predictive Coding. Moreover, EIMs allow us to generalize a recent connection between multi-sample variational lower bounds and auxiliary variable variational inference. We show how recent variational bounds can be unified with EIMs as the variational family. Dieterich Lawson, George Tucker, Bo Dai 0001, Rajesh Ranganath |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning Hard Alignments with Variational InferenceabstractThere has recently been significant interest in hard attention models for tasks such as object recognition, visual captioning and speech recognition. Hard attention offers benefits over soft attention such as decreased computational cost, but training hard attention models can be difficult because of the discrete latent variables they introduce. Previous work used REINFORCE to approach these issues, however, it suffers from high-variance gradient estimates, resulting in slow convergence. In this paper, we tackle the problem of learning hard attention for a sequential task using variational inference methods, specifically the recently introduced Variational Inference for Monte Carlo Objectives (VIMCO) and Neural Variational Inference (NVIL). Furthermore, we propose a novel baseline that adapts VIMCO to this setting. We demonstrate our method on a phoneme recognition task in clean and noisy environments and show that our method outperforms REINFORCE, with the difference being greater for a more complicated task. Dieterich Lawson, Chung-Cheng Chiu, George Tucker, Colin Raffel, Kevin Swersky, Navdeep Jaitly |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2017 | Filtering Variational ObjectivesabstractWhen used as a surrogate objective for maximum likelihood estimation in latent variable models, the evidence lower bound (ELBO) produces state-of-the-art results. Inspired by this, we consider the extension of the ELBO to a family of lower bounds defined by a particle filter's estimator of the marginal likelihood, the filtering variational objectives (FIVOs). FIVOs take the same arguments as the ELBO, but can exploit a model's sequential structure to form tighter bounds. We present results that relate the tightness of FIVO's bound to the variance of the particle filter's estimator by considering the generic case of bounds defined as log-transformed likelihood estimators. Experimentally, we show that training with FIVO results in substantial improvements over training the same model architecture with the ELBO on sequential data. Chris J. Maddison, Dieterich Lawson, George Tucker, Nicolas Heess, Mohammad Norouzi 0002, Andriy Mnih, Arnaud Doucet, Yee Whye Teh |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | REBAR: Low-variance, unbiased gradient estimates for discrete latent variable modelsabstractLearning in models with discrete latent variables is challenging due to high variance gradient estimators. Generally, approaches have relied on control variates to reduce the variance of the REINFORCE estimator. Recent work \citep{jang2016categorical, maddison2016concrete} has taken a different approach, introducing a continuous relaxation of discrete variables to produce low-variance, but biased, gradient estimates. In this work, we combine the two approaches through a novel control variate that produces low-variance, \emph{unbiased} gradient estimates. Then, we introduce a modification to the continuous relaxation and show that the tightness of the relaxation can be adapted online, removing it as a hyperparameter. We show state-of-the-art variance reduction on several benchmark generative modeling tasks, generally leading to faster convergence to a better final log-likelihood. George Tucker, Andriy Mnih, Chris J. Maddison, Dieterich Lawson, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein |
NIPS | 4 |