EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon Kohl
dblp:195/6111 · also Simon A. A. Kohl
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 67% Generative modeling · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
conditional variational autoencoder |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
probabilistic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision-making |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
u-net · 0.7generative segmentation · 0.7conditional variational autoencoder · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | RecycleNet: Latent Feature Recycling Leads to Iterative Decision RefinementabstractDespite the remarkable success of deep learning systems over the last decade, a key difference still remains between neural network and human decision-making: As humans, we can not only form a decision on the spot, but also ponder, revisiting an initial guess from different angles, distilling relevant information, arriving at a better decision. Here, we propose RecycleNet, a latent feature recycling method, instilling the pondering capability for neural networks to refine initial decisions over a number of recycling steps, where outputs are fed back into earlier network layers in an iterative fashion. This approach makes minimal assumptions about the neural network architecture and thus can be implemented in a wide variety of contexts. Using medical image segmentation as the evaluation environment, we show that latent feature recycling enables the network to iteratively refine initial predictions even beyond the iterations seen during training, converging towards an improved decision. We evaluate this across a variety of segmentation benchmarks and show consistent improvements even compared with top-performing segmentation methods. This allows trading increased computation time for improved performance, which can be beneficial, especially for safety-critical applications. Gregor Köhler, Tassilo Wald, Constantin Ulrich, David Zimmerer, Paul F. Jaeger, Jörg K. H. Franke, Simon Kohl, Fabian Isensee, Klaus H. Maier-Hein |
WACV | 7 |
| 2023 | The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)abstractIn this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://medicaldecathlon.com/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094. Patrick Bilic, Patrick Ferdinand Christ, Hongwei Li 0004, Eugene Vorontsov, Avi Ben-Cohen, Georgios Kaissis, Adi Szeskin, Colin Jacobs, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Mamani, Gabriel Chartrand, Fabian Lohöfer, Julian Walter Holch, Wieland H. Sommer, Felix Hofmann, Alexandre Hostettler, Naama Lev-Cohain, Michal Drozdzal, Michal Amitai, Refael Vivanti, Jacob Sosna, Ivan Ezhov, Anjany Sekuboyina, Fernando Navarro, Florian Kofler, Johannes C. Paetzold, Suprosanna Shit, Xiaobin Hu, Jana Lipková, Markus Rempfler, Marie Piraud, Jan Kirschke, Benedikt Wiestler, Christian Hülsemeyer, Marcel Beetz, Florian Ettlinger, Michela Antonelli, Woong Bae, Miriam Bellver, Lei Bi 0001, Hao Chen 0011, Grzegorz Chlebus, Erik Dam, Qi Dou 0001, Chi-Wing Fu, Bogdan Georgescu, Xavier Giró-i-Nieto, Felix Grün, Xu Han 0009, Pheng-Ann Heng, Jürgen Hesser, Jan Hendrik Moltz, Christian Igel, Fabian Isensee, Paul F. Jaeger, Fucang Jia, Krishna Chaitanya Kaluva, Mahendra Khened, Ildoo Kim, Jae-Hun Kim, Sungwoong Kim, Simon Kohl, Tomasz K. Konopczynski, Avinash Kori, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi, Xiaomeng Li 0001, John S. Lowengrub, Jun Ma 0016, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Kevis-Kokitsi Maninis, Hans Meine, Dorit Merhof, Akshay Pai, Mathias Perslev, Jens Petersen, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Xiaojuan Qi 0001, Oliver Rippel, Karsten Roth, Ignacio Sarasua, Andrea Schenk, Zengming Shen, Jordi Torres, Christian Wachinger, Chunliang Wang, Leon Weninger, Daguang Xu, Xiaoping Yang 0001, Simon C. H. Yu, Yading Yuan, Miao Yue, Liping Zhang 0009, Manuel Jorge Cardoso, Spyridon Bakas, Rickmer Braren, Volker Heinemann, Christopher Joseph Pal, An Tang, Samuel Kadoury, Luc Soler, Bram van Ginneken, Hayit Greenspan, Leo Joskowicz, Bjoern Menze |
Medical Image Anal. | 62 |
| 2019 | Deep Probabilistic Modeling of Glioma Growth
Jens Petersen, Paul F. Jaeger, Fabian Isensee, Simon Kohl, Ulf Neuberger, Wolfgang Wick, Jürgen Debus, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Philipp Vollmuth, Klaus H. Maier-Hein |
MICCAI (2) | 4 |
| 2019 | Unsupervised Anomaly Localization Using Variational Auto-Encoders
David Zimmerer, Fabian Isensee, Jens Petersen, Simon Kohl, Klaus H. Maier-Hein |
MICCAI (4) | 4 |
| 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous ImagesabstractMany real-world vision problems suffer from inherent ambiguities. In clinical applications for example, it might not be clear from a CT scan alone which particular region is cancer tissue. Therefore a group of graders typically produces a set of diverse but plausible segmentations. We consider the task of learning a distribution over segmentations given an input. To this end we propose a generative segmentation model based on a combination of a U-Net with a conditional variational autoencoder that is capable of efficiently producing an unlimited number of plausible hypotheses. We show on a lung abnormalities segmentation task and on a Cityscapes segmentation task that our model reproduces the possible segmentation variants as well as the frequencies with which they occur, doing so significantly better than published approaches. These models could have a high impact in real-world applications, such as being used as clinical decision-making algorithms accounting for multiple plausible semantic segmentation hypotheses to provide possible diagnoses and recommend further actions to resolve the present ambiguities. Simon Kohl, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Clemens Meyer, Jeffrey De Fauw, Joseph R. Ledsam, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, S. M. Ali Eslami, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Olaf Ronneberger |
NeurIPS | 1 |