Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Saheed A. Busari

dblp:195/6209 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.622017
Towards search-based modelling and analysis of requirements and architecture decisions · ASE 2017
RADAR: a lightweight tool for requirements and architecture decision analysis · ICSE 2017
Requirements engineering and software design › goal-oriented requirements engineering
goal modeling
0.112017
RADAR: a lightweight tool for requirements and architecture decision analysis · ICSE 2017
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.112017
Towards search-based modelling and analysis of requirements and architecture decisions · ASE 2017
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
search-based software engineering
0.112017
Towards search-based modelling and analysis of requirements and architecture decisions · ASE 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantitative AND/OR goal models · 0.6multi-objective simulation optimization · 0.6stochastic simulation · 0.3probabilistic modeling · 0.3multi-objective optimization · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 RADAR: a lightweight tool for requirements and architecture decision analysis
abstract
Uncertainty and conflicting stakeholders' objectives make many requirements and architecture decisions particularly hard. Quantitative probabilistic models allow software architects to analyse such decisions using stochastic simulation and multi-objective optimisation, but the difficulty of elaborating the models is an obstacle to the wider adoption of such techniques. To reduce this obstacle, this paper presents a novel modelling language and analysis tool, called RADAR, intended to facilitate requirements and architecture decision analysis. The language has relations to quantitative AND/OR goal models used in requirements engineering and to feature models used in software product lines. However, it simplifies such models to a minimum set of language constructs essential for decision analysis. The paper presents RADAR's modelling language, automated support for decision analysis, and evaluates its application to four real-world examples.
Saheed A. Busari, Emmanuel Letier
ICSE1
2017 Towards search-based modelling and analysis of requirements and architecture decisions
abstract
Many requirements engineering and software architecture decisions are complicated by uncertainty and multiple conflicting stakeholders objectives. Using quantitative decision models helps clarify these decisions and allows the use of multi-objective simulation optimisation techniques in analysing the impact of decisions on objectives. Existing requirements and architecture decision support methods that use quantitative decision models are limited by the difficulty in elaborating problem-specific decision models and/or lack integrated tool support for automated decision analysis under uncertainty. To address these problems and facilitate requirements and architecture decision analysis, this research proposes a novel modelling language and automated decision analysis technique, implemented in a tool called RADAR. The modelling language is a simplified version of quantitative AND/OR goal models used in requirements engineering and similar to feature models used in software product lines. This research involves developing the RADAR tool and evaluating the tool's applicability, usefulness and scalability on a set of real-world examples.
Saheed A. Busari
ASE1
2016 Searching for Configurations in Clone Evaluation - A Replication Study
Chaiyong Ragkhitwetsagul, Matheus Paixão, Manal T. Adham, Saheed A. Busari, Jens Krinke, John H. Drake
SSBSE4