Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julia Proft
dblp:195/6902
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-AI interaction · 47% Human-robot interaction · 46% Games and playful interaction · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
human-AI collaboration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Implicit Communication of Actionable Information in Human-AI teams · CHI 2019 |
Human-robot interaction › robot communication
implicit communication |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Implicit Communication in a Joint Action · HRI 2017 |
Human-robot interaction › human-robot collaboration
joint action |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Implicit Communication in a Joint Action · HRI 2017 |
Human-robot interaction › human-robot collaboration
collaborative assembly |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Implicit Communication in a Joint Action · HRI 2017 |
Human-robot interaction › robot navigation
social navigation |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Implicit Communication in a Joint Action · HRI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.4implicature modeling · 0.4framework · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Implicit Communication of Actionable Information in Human-AI teamsabstractHumans expect their collaborators to look beyond the explicit interpretation of their words. Implicature is a common form of implicit communication that arises in natural language discourse when an utterance leverages context to imply information beyond what the words literally convey. Whereas computational methods have been proposed for interpreting and using different forms of implicature, its role in human and artificial agent collaboration has not yet been explored in a concrete domain. The results of this paper provide insights to how artificial agents should be structured to facilitate natural and efficient communication of actionable information with humans. We investigated implicature by implementing two strategies for playing Hanabi, a cooperative card game that relies heavily on communication of actionable implicit information to achieve a shared goal. In a user study with 904 completed games and 246 completed surveys, human players randomly paired with an implicature AI are 71% more likely to think their partner is human than players paired with a non-implicature AI. These teams demonstrated game performance similar to other state of the art approaches. Claire Liang, Julia Proft, Erik Andersen 0001, Ross A. Knepper |
CHI | 2 |
| 2017 | Implicit Communication in a Joint ActionabstractRobots must be cognizant of how their actions will be interpreted in context. Actions performed in the context of a joint activity comprise two aspects: functional and communicative. The functional component achieves the goal of the action, whereas its communicative component, when present, expresses some information to the actor's partners in the joint activity. The interpretation of such communication requires leveraging information that is public to all participants, known as common ground. Much of human communication is performed through this implicit mechanism, and humans cannot help but infer some meaning -- whether or not it was intended by the actor -- from most actions. We present a framework for robots to utilize this communicative channel on top of normal functional actions to work more effectively with human partners. We consider the role of the actor and the observer, both individually and jointly, in implicit communication, as well as the effects of timing. We also show how the framework maps onto various modes of action, including natural language and motion. We consider these modes of action in various human-robot interaction domains, including social navigation and collaborative assembly. Ross A. Knepper, Christoforos I. Mavrogiannis, Julia Proft, Claire Liang |
HRI | 3 |