Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhucheng Tu

dblp:195/7964 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › interactive question answering
conversational question answering
0.512021
Question Rewriting for Conversational Question Answering · WSDM 2021
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question rewriting
0.512021
Question Rewriting for Conversational Question Answering · WSDM 2021
Information retrieval › document retrieval
passage retrieval
0.112021
Question Rewriting for Conversational Question Answering · WSDM 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence-to-sequence model · 1.0BERT · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 A Comparison of Question Rewriting Methods for Conversational Passage Retrieval
Svitlana Vakulenko, Nikos Voskarides, Zhucheng Tu, Shayne Longpre
ECIR (2)3
2021 Open-Domain Question Answering Goes Conversational via Question Rewriting
abstract
Raviteja Anantha, Svitlana Vakulenko, Zhucheng Tu, Shayne Longpre, Stephen Pulman, Srinivas Chappidi. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021.
Raviteja Anantha, Svitlana Vakulenko, Zhucheng Tu, Shayne Longpre, Stephen G. Pulman, Srinivas Chappidi
NAACL-HLT3
2021 Question Rewriting for Conversational Question Answering
abstract
Conversational question answering (QA) requires the ability to correctly interpret a question in the context of previous conversation turns. We address the conversational QA task by decomposing it into question rewriting and question answering subtasks. The question rewriting (QR) subtask is specifically designed to reformulate ambiguous questions, which depend on the conversational context, into unambiguous questions that can be correctly interpreted outside of the conversational context. We introduce a conversational QA architecture that sets the new state of the art on the TREC CAsT 2019 passage retrieval dataset. Moreover, we show that the same QR model improves QA performance on the QuAC dataset with respect to answer span extraction, which is the next step in QA after passage retrieval. Our evaluation results indicate that the QR model we proposed achieves near human-level performance on both datasets and the gap in performance on the end-to-end conversational QA task is attributed mostly to the errors in QA.
Svitlana Vakulenko, Shayne Longpre, Zhucheng Tu, Raviteja Anantha
WSDM3
2018 An Experimental Analysis of the Power Consumption of Convolutional Neural Networks for Keyword Spotting
abstract
Nearly all previous work on small-footprint keyword spotting with neural networks quantify model footprint in terms of the number of parameters and multiply operations for a feedforward inference pass. These values are, however, proxy measures since empirical performance in actual deployments is determined by many factors. In this paper, we study the power consumption of a family of convolutional neural networks for keyword spotting on a Raspberry Pi. We find that both proxies are good predictors of energy usage, although the number of multiplies is more predictive than the number of model parameters. We also confirm that models with the highest accuracies are, unsurprisingly, the most power hungry.
Raphael Tang, Zhucheng Tu, Jimmy Lin
ICASSP3