Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gokay Coruhlu
dblp:195/8369
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-8821-6214ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 44% Reinforcement learning · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partial observability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Explainable Robotic Plan Execution Monitoring Under Partial Observability · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › plan execution
plan execution monitoring |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Explainable Robotic Plan Execution Monitoring Under Partial Observability · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
replanning · 0.6hybrid logical-probabilistic reasoning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Explainable Robotic Plan Execution Monitoring Under Partial ObservabilityabstractSuccessful plan generation for autonomous systems is necessary but not sufficient to guarantee reaching a goal state by an execution of a plan. Various discrepancies between an expected state and the observed state may occur during the plan execution (e.g., due to unexpected exogenous events, changes in the goals, or failure of robot parts) and these discrepancies may lead to plan failures. For that reason, autonomous systems should be equipped with execution monitoring algorithms so that they can autonomously recover from such discrepancies. We introduce a plan execution monitoring algorithm that operates under partial observability. This algorithm relies on novel formal methods for hybrid prediction, diagnosis and explanation generation, and planning. The prediction module generates an expected state after the execution of a part of the plan from an incomplete state to check for discrepancies. The diagnostic reasoning module generates meaningful hypotheses to explain failures of robot parts. Unlike the existing diagnosis methods, the previous hypotheses can be revised, based on new partial observations, increasing the accuracy of explanations as further information becomes available. The replanning module considers these explanations while computing a new plan that would avoid such failures. All these reasoning modules are hybrid in that they combine high-level logical reasoning with low-level feasibility checks based on probabilistic methods. We experimentally show that these hybrid formal reasoning modules improve the performance of plan execution monitoring. Gokay Coruhlu, Esra Erdem 0001, Volkan Patoglu |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 1 |