Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrea Lomuscio

dblp:196/2947 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 50% Software testing · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
fault tolerance
0.312017
Combining fault injection and model checking to verify fault tolerance, recoverability, and diagnosability in multi-agent systems · Inf. Comput. 2017
Software testing › mutation testing
fault injection
0.312017
Combining fault injection and model checking to verify fault tolerance, recoverability, and diagnosability in multi-agent systems · Inf. Comput. 2017
Program verification
model checking
0.312017
Combining fault injection and model checking to verify fault tolerance, recoverability, and diagnosability in multi-agent systems · Inf. Comput. 2017
Internet architecture and protocols › local area network › ring network
token ring
0.112017
Combining fault injection and model checking to verify fault tolerance, recoverability, and diagnosability in multi-agent systems · Inf. Comput. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal-epistemic logic · 0.9model checking · 0.9fault injection · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Combining fault injection and model checking to verify fault tolerance, recoverability, and diagnosability in multi-agent systems
abstract
We present an automated technique that combines fault injection with model checking to verify fault tolerance, recoverability, and diagnosability in multi-agent systems. We define a general method for mutating a multi-agent systems model representing correct behaviour by injecting faults into it, and specification patterns based on temporal-epistemic formulas to reason about the correct and faulty behaviours of the mutated model. The technique is implemented in a toolkit that can be used for injecting automatically faults into a multi-agent systems program. The usefulness of the methodology is demonstrated by injecting a number of faults into a model of the IEEE 802.5 token ring LAN protocol and analysing the protocol's fault tolerance, by verifying a number of temporal-epistemic specifications.
Jonathan Ezekiel, Andrea Lomuscio
Inf. Comput.2