EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elias Englmeier
dblp:196/8049
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Spatial and temporal data management · 50% Query processing and optimization · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization › incremental computation
incremental nearest-neighbor search |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Dimensional Testing for Reverse k-Nearest Neighbor Search · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 |
Spatial and temporal data management › reverse nearest neighbor
reverse k-nearest neighbor search |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Dimensional Testing for Reverse k-Nearest Neighbor Search · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
termination tests · 0.3pruning · 0.3intrinsic dimensionality characterization · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Dimensional Testing for Reverse k-Nearest Neighbor SearchabstractGiven a query object q, reverse k -nearest neighbor (R k NN) search aims to locate those objects of the database that have q among their k -nearest neighbors. In this paper, we propose an approximation method for solving R k NN queries, where the pruning operations and termination tests are guided by a characterization of the intrinsic dimensionality of the data. The method can accommodate any index structure supporting incremental (forward) nearest-neighbor search for the generation and verification of candidates, while avoiding impractically-high preprocessing costs. We also provide experimental evidence that our method significantly outperforms its competitors in terms of the tradeoff between execution time and the quality of the approximation. Our approach thus addresses many of the scalability issues surrounding the use of previous methods in data mining. Guillaume Casanova, Elias Englmeier, Michael E. Houle, Peer Kröger, Michael Nett, Erich Schubert, Arthur Zimek |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |