Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiaomeng Jin

dblp:196/9123 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Language models and text generation · 15% Deep learning architectures and training · 15% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
contrastive data augmentation
0.912025
Contrastive Visual Data Augmentation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
image augmentation
0.912025
Contrastive Visual Data Augmentation · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.812024
MIRACLE: An Online, Explainable Multimodal Interactive Concept Learning System · ACM Multimedia 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual concept recognition
0.812024
MIRACLE: An Online, Explainable Multimodal Interactive Concept Learning System · ACM Multimedia 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › molecular representation learning
molecular graph learning
0.612022
Chemical-Reaction-Aware Molecule Representation Learning · ICLR 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
molecular representation learning
0.612022
Chemical-Reaction-Aware Molecule Representation Learning · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.412019
On the Sensitivity of Adversarial Robustness to Input Data Distributions · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift
0.412019
On the Sensitivity of Adversarial Robustness to Input Data Distributions · ICLR (Poster) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge base · 1.5heatmap visualization · 1.5few-shot learning · 1.5chemical reaction awareness · 1.1synthetic data filtering · 0.9multimodal generative model · 0.9multimodal generation · 0.9large language model · 0.9contrastive feature extraction · 0.9adversarial training · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SYNTHIA: Novel Concept Design with Affordance Composition
abstract
Hyeonjeong Ha, Xiaomeng Jin, Jeonghwan Kim, Jiateng Liu, Zhenhailong Wang, Khanh Duy Nguyen, Ansel Blume, Nanyun Peng, Kai-Wei Chang, Heng Ji. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Hyeonjeong Ha, Xiaomeng Jin, Jiateng Liu, Zhenhailong Wang, Khanh Duy Nguyen, Ansel Blume, Nanyun Peng 0001, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Heng Ji 0001
ACL (1)2
2025 Contrastive Visual Data Augmentation
abstract
Large multimodal models (LMMs) often struggle to recognize novel concepts, as they rely on pre-trained knowledge and have limited ability to capture subtle visual details. Domain-specific knowledge gaps in training also make them prone to confusing visually similar, commonly misrepresented, or low-resource concepts. To help LMMs better align nuanced visual features with language, improving their ability to recognize and reason about novel or rare concepts, we propose a Contrastive visual Data Augmentation (CoDA) strategy. CoDA extracts key contrastive textual and visual features of target concepts against the known concepts they are misrecognized as, and then uses multimodal generative models to produce targeted synthetic data. Automatic filtering of extracted features and augmented images is implemented to guarantee their quality, as verified by human annotators. We show the effectiveness and efficiency of CoDA on low-resource concept and diverse scene recognition datasets including INaturalist and SUN. We additionally collect NovelSpecies, a benchmark dataset consisting of newly discovered animal species that are guaranteed to be unseen by LMMs. LLaVA-1.6 1-shot updating results on these three datasets show CoDA significantly improves SOTA visual data augmentation strategies by 12.3% (NovelSpecies), 5.1% (SUN), and 6.0% (iNat) absolute gains in accuracy.
Yu Zhou 0030, Mohan Tang, Xiaomeng Jin, Te-Lin Wu, Kuan-Hao Huang, Heng Ji 0001, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Nanyun Peng 0001
ICML4
2025 Unlearning as multi-task optimization: A normalized gradient difference approach with an adaptive learning rate
abstract
Xiaomeng Jin, Zhiqi Bu, Bhanukiran Vinzamuri, Anil Ramakrishna, Kai-Wei Chang, Volkan Cevher, Mingyi Hong. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Xiaomeng Jin, Zhiqi Bu, Bhanukiran Vinzamuri, Anil Ramakrishna, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Volkan Cevher, Mingyi Hong 0001
NAACL (Long Papers)1
2025 PARTONOMY: Large Multimodal Models with Part-Level Visual Understanding
abstract
Real-world objects are composed of distinctive, object-specific parts. Identifying these parts is key to performing fine-grained, compositional reasoning—yet, large multimodal models (LMMs) struggle to perform this seemingly straightforward task. In this work, we introduce PARTONOMY, an LMM benchmark designed for pixel-level part grounding. We construct PARTONOMY from existing part datasets and our own rigorously annotated set of images, encompassing 862 parts and 5346 objects for evaluation. Unlike existing datasets that simply ask models to identify generic parts, PARTONOMY utilizes highly technical concepts and challenges models to compare objects’ parts, consider part-whole relationships, and justify textual predictions with visual segmentations. Our experiments demonstrate significant limitations in state-of-the-art LMMs (e.g., LISA-13B achieves only 5.9% gIoU), highlighting a critical gap in their part grounding abilities. We note that existing segmentation-enabled LMMs (segmenting LMMs) have two key architectural shortcomings: they use special [SEG] tokens not seen during pretraining which induce distribution shift, and they discard predicted segmentations instead of using past predictions to guide future ones. To address these deficiencies, we train several part-centric LMMs and propose PLUM, a novel segmenting LMM that utilizes span tagging instead of segmentation tokens and that conditions on prior predictions in a feedback loop. We find that pretrained PLUM dominates existing segmenting LMMs on reasoning segmentation, VQA, and visual hallucination benchmarks. In addition, PLUM finetuned on our proposed Explanatory Part Segmentation task is competitive with segmenting LMMs trained on significantly more segmentation data. Our work opens up new avenues towards enabling fine-grained, grounded visual understanding in LMMs.
Ansel Blume, Hyeonjeong Ha, Elen Chatikyan, Xiaomeng Jin, Khanh Duy Nguyen, Nanyun Peng 0001, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Derek Hoiem, Heng Ji 0001
NeurIPS5
2024 Schema-based Data Augmentation for Event Extraction
abstract
Event extraction is a crucial task for semantic understanding and structured knowledge construction. However, the expense of collecting and labeling data for training event extraction models is usually high. To address this issue, we propose a novel schema-based data augmentation method that utilizes event schemas to guide the data generation process. The event schemas depict the typical patterns of complex events and can be used to create new synthetic data for event extraction. Specifically, we sub-sample from the schema graph to obtain a subgraph, instantiate the schema subgraph, and then convert the instantiated subgraph to natural language texts. We conduct extensive experiments on event trigger detection, event trigger extraction, and event argument extraction tasks using two datasets (including five scenarios). The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed data-augmentation method produces high-quality generated data and significantly enhances the model performance, with up to 12% increase in F1 score compared to baseline methods.
Xiaomeng Jin, Heng Ji 0001
LREC/COLING1
2024 MIRACLE: An Online, Explainable Multimodal Interactive Concept Learning System
abstract
We present MIRACLE, a system for online, interpretable visual concept and video action recognition. Through a chat interface, users query the recognition system with an uploaded image or video. For images, MIRACLE returns concept predictions from its structured knowledge base, justifying its predictions with heatmaps and natural language-based attribute detections. For videos, MIRACLE predicts an action and justifies its prediction with time varying entity-entity relations. With its ability to learn new concepts in an online, few-shot manner and its support of dynamic changes to its knowledge base, MIRACLE represents a step forward in interpretable multimodal learning systems.
Ansel Blume, Khanh Duy Nguyen, Zhenhailong Wang, Yangyi Chen, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Xiaomeng Jin, Zhen Zhu 0006, Jiateng Liu, Kuan-Hao Huang, Mankeerat Sidhu, Xuanming Zhang, Vivian Liu, Raunak Sinha, Te-Lin Wu, Abhaysinh Zala, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Da Yin, Utkarsh Mall, Zhou Yu 0005, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Camille Cobb, Karrie Karahalios, Lydia B. Chilton, Mohit Bansal, Nanyun Peng 0001, Carl Vondrick, Derek Hoiem, Heng Ji 0001
ACM Multimedia6
2022 Chemical-Reaction-Aware Molecule Representation Learning
Weijiang Li, Xiaomeng Jin, Kyunghyun Cho, Heng Ji 0001, Jiawei Han 0001, Martin D. Burke
ICLR3
2022 Event Schema Induction with Double Graph Autoencoders
abstract
Event schema depicts the typical structure of complex events, serving as a scaffolding to effectively analyze, predict, and possibly intervene in the ongoing events.To induce event schemas from historical events, previous work uses an event-by-event scheme, ignoring the global structure of the entire schema graph.We propose a new event schema induction framework using double graph autoencoders, which captures the global dependencies among nodes in event graphs.Specifically, we first extract the event skeleton from an event graph and design a variational directed acyclic graph (DAG) autoencoder to learn its global structure.Then we further fill in the event arguments for the skeleton, and use another Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) based autoencoder to reconstruct entity-entity relations as well as to detect coreferential entities.By performing this twostage induction decomposition, the model can avoid reconstructing the entire graph in one step, allowing it to focus on learning global structures between events.Experimental results on three event graph datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance and induces high-quality event schemas with global consistency.1
Xiaomeng Jin, Manling Li, Heng Ji 0001
NAACL-HLT1
2019 On the Sensitivity of Adversarial Robustness to Input Data Distributions
Gavin Weiguang Ding, Kry Yik Chau Lui, Xiaomeng Jin, Luyu Wang, Ruitong Huang
ICLR (Poster)3
2018 Gender, confidence, and mark prediction in CS examinations
abstract
A common refrain heard by instructors of CS1 courses is ``I'm sure I did better than that" or ``I have no idea how I got that mark". Sometimes differences in a student's expected and reported marks may be due to a mistake on the part of the grader of the work, but more often than not this is an indicator that a student is not accurately assessing their own level of achievement on a piece of work. This may be an issue of capability (some students may lack the tools to assess what they have done correctly or incorrectly?) or one of confidence (some students are certain they are making mistakes even if they have done everything correctly). Regardless of the source of the gap between predicted and reported grades, it is an important skill for students to be able to accurately assess their own capabilities and performance.
Brian Harrington 0001, Shichong Peng, Xiaomeng Jin, Minhaz Khan
ITiCSE3