Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian D. Aevermann

dblp:197/3650 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1346-1327ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
data integration
0.612022
FastMix: a versatile data integration pipeline for cell type-specific biomarker inference · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology
immunoinformatics
0.612022
FastMix: a versatile data integration pipeline for cell type-specific biomarker inference · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression quantification
gene expression deconvolution
0.212022
FastMix: a versatile data integration pipeline for cell type-specific biomarker inference · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

moment-based estimator · 0.6linear mixed effects model · 0.6DAFi · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 FastMix: a versatile data integration pipeline for cell type-specific biomarker inference
abstract
MOTIVATION: Flow cytometry (FCM) and transcription profiling are the two widely used assays in translational immunology research. However, there is no data integration pipeline for analyzing these two types of assays together with experiment variables for biomarker inference. Current FCM data analysis mainly relies on subjective manual gating analysis, which is difficult to be directly integrated with other automated computational methods. Existing deconvolutional analysis of bulk transcriptomics relies on predefined marker genes in the transcriptomics data, which are unavailable for novel cell types and does not utilize the FCM data that provide canonical phenotypic definitions of the cell types. RESULTS: We developed a novel analytics pipeline-FastMix-for computational immunology, which integrates flow cytometry, bulk transcriptomics and clinical covariates for identifying cell type-specific gene expression signatures and biomarker genes. FastMix addresses the 'large p, small n' problem in the gene expression and flow cytometry integration analysis via a linear mixed effects model (LMER) for both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Its novel moment-based estimator not only reduces bias in parameter estimation but also is more efficient than iterative optimization. The FastMix pipeline also includes a cutting-edge flow cytometry data analysis method-DAFi-for identifying cell populations of interest and their characteristics. Simulation studies showed that FastMix produced smaller type I/II errors than competing methods. Validation using real data of two vaccine studies showed that FastMix identified a consistent set of signature genes as in independent single-cell RNA-seq analysis, producing additional interesting findings. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code of FastMix is publicly available at https://github.com/terrysun0302/FastMix. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Yun Zhang 0021, Aishwarya Mandava, Brian D. Aevermann, Tobias R. Kollmann, Richard H. Scheuermann, Xing Qiu
Bioinform.4
2021 FR-Match: robust matching of cell type clusters from single cell RNA sequencing data using the Friedman-Rafsky non-parametric test
abstract
Single cell/nucleus RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) is emerging as an essential tool to unravel the phenotypic heterogeneity of cells in complex biological systems. While computational methods for scRNAseq cell type clustering have advanced, the ability to integrate datasets to identify common and novel cell types across experiments remains a challenge. Here, we introduce a cluster-to-cluster cell type matching method-FR-Match-that utilizes supervised feature selection for dimensionality reduction and incorporates shared information among cells to determine whether two cell type clusters share the same underlying multivariate gene expression distribution. FR-Match is benchmarked with existing cell-to-cell and cell-to-cluster cell type matching methods using both simulated and real scRNAseq data. FR-Match proved to be a stringent method that produced fewer erroneous matches of distinct cell subtypes and had the unique ability to identify novel cell phenotypes in new datasets. In silico validation demonstrated that the proposed workflow is the only self-contained algorithm that was robust to increasing numbers of true negatives (i.e. non-represented cell types). FR-Match was applied to two human brain scRNAseq datasets sampled from cortical layer 1 and full thickness middle temporal gyrus. When mapping cell types identified in specimens isolated from these overlapping human brain regions, FR-Match precisely recapitulated the laminar characteristics of matched cell type clusters, reflecting their distinct neuroanatomical distributions. An R package and Shiny application are provided at https://github.com/JCVenterInstitute/FRmatch for users to interactively explore and match scRNAseq cell type clusters with complementary visualization tools.
Yun Zhang 0021, Brian D. Aevermann, Trygve E. Bakken, Jeremy A. Miller, Rebecca D. Hodge, Ed S. Lein, Richard H. Scheuermann
Briefings Bioinform.2
2017 Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping
abstract
BACKGROUND: A fundamental characteristic of multicellular organisms is the specialization of functional cell types through the process of differentiation. These specialized cell types not only characterize the normal functioning of different organs and tissues, they can also be used as cellular biomarkers of a variety of different disease states and therapeutic/vaccine responses. In order to serve as a reference for cell type representation, the Cell Ontology has been developed to provide a standard nomenclature of defined cell types for comparative analysis and biomarker discovery. Historically, these cell types have been defined based on unique cellular shapes and structures, anatomic locations, and marker protein expression. However, we are now experiencing a revolution in cellular characterization resulting from the application of new high-throughput, high-content cytometry and sequencing technologies. The resulting explosion in the number of distinct cell types being identified is challenging the current paradigm for cell type definition in the Cell Ontology. RESULTS: In this paper, we provide examples of state-of-the-art cellular biomarker characterization using high-content cytometry and single cell RNA sequencing, and present strategies for standardized cell type representations based on the data outputs from these cutting-edge technologies, including "context annotations" in the form of standardized experiment metadata about the specimen source analyzed and marker genes that serve as the most useful features in machine learning-based cell type classification models. We also propose a statistical strategy for comparing new experiment data to these standardized cell type representations. CONCLUSION: The advent of high-throughput/high-content single cell technologies is leading to an explosion in the number of distinct cell types being identified. It will be critical for the bioinformatics community to develop and adopt data standard conventions that will be compatible with these new technologies and support the data representation needs of the research community. The proposals enumerated here will serve as a useful starting point to address these challenges.
Trygve E. Bakken, Lindsay G. Cowell, Brian D. Aevermann, Mark Novotny, Rebecca D. Hodge, Jeremy A. Miller, Alexandra Lee, Ivan Chang, Jamison M. McCorrison, Bali Pulendran, Nicholas J. Schork, Roger S. Lasken, Ed S. Lein, Richard H. Scheuermann
BMC Bioinform.3