Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tingyou Zhou
dblp:197/8093
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 75% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
dependence measure |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical Insights into HSIC in High Dimensions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
hilbert-schmidt independence criterion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical Insights into HSIC in High Dimensions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical Insights into HSIC in High Dimensions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
independence testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical Insights into HSIC in High Dimensions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uniform convergence · 0.7asymptotic analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Statistical Insights into HSIC in High DimensionsabstractMeasuring the nonlinear dependence between random vectors and testing for their statistical independence is a fundamental problem in statistics. One of the most popular dependence measures is the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC), which has attracted increasing attention in recent years. However, most existing works have focused on either fixed or very high-dimensional covariates. In this work, we bridge the gap between these two scenarios and provide statistical insights into the performance of HSIC when the dimensions grow at different rates. We first show that, under the null hypothesis, the rescaled HSIC converges in distribution to a standard normal distribution. Then we provide a general condition for the HSIC based tests to have nontrivial power in high dimensions. By decomposing this condition, we illustrate how the ability of HSIC to measure nonlinear dependence changes with increasing dimensions. Moreover, we demonstrate that, depending on the sample size, the covariate dimensions and the dependence structures within covariates, the HSIC can capture different types of associations between random vectors. We also conduct extensive numerical studies to validate our theoretical results. Yaowu Zhang, Tingyou Zhou |
NeurIPS | 3 |