Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Charlotte A. Darby

dblp:197/8096 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-2195-5300ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression quantification
allele-specific expression
0.412020
scHLAcount: allele-specific HLA expression from single-cell gene expression data · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
read mapping
0.412020
Vargas: heuristic-free alignment for assessing linear and graph read aligners · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.412020
Vargas: heuristic-free alignment for assessing linear and graph read aligners · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell RNA sequencing
single-cell RNA-seq analysis
0.412020
scHLAcount: allele-specific HLA expression from single-cell gene expression data · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.312017
Xenolog classification · Bioinform. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semiglobal alignment · 0.4personalized reference construction · 0.4multi-core parallelization · 0.4molecule-level counting · 0.4affine gap penalty · 0.4SIMD vectorization · 0.4phylogenetic reconciliation · 0.3gene tree analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Vargas: heuristic-free alignment for assessing linear and graph read aligners
abstract
MOTIVATION: Read alignment is central to many aspects of modern genomics. Most aligners use heuristics to accelerate processing, but these heuristics can fail to find the optimal alignments of reads. Alignment accuracy is typically measured through simulated reads; however, the simulated location may not be the (only) location with the optimal alignment score. RESULTS: Vargas implements a heuristic-free algorithm guaranteed to find the highest-scoring alignment for real sequencing reads to a linear or graph genome. With semiglobal and local alignment modes and affine gap and quality-scaled mismatch penalties, it can implement the scoring functions of commonly used aligners to calculate optimal alignments. While this is computationally intensive, Vargas uses multi-core parallelization and vectorized (SIMD) instructions to make it practical to optimally align large numbers of reads, achieving a maximum speed of 456 billion cell updates per second. We demonstrate how these 'gold standard' Vargas alignments can be used to improve heuristic alignment accuracy by optimizing command-line parameters in Bowtie 2, BWA-maximal exact match and vg to align more reads correctly. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code implemented in C++ and compiled binary releases are available at https://github.com/langmead-lab/vargas under the MIT license. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Charlotte A. Darby, Ravi Gaddipati, Michael C. Schatz, Ben Langmead
Bioinform.1
2020 scHLAcount: allele-specific HLA expression from single-cell gene expression data
abstract
SUMMARY: Bulk RNA sequencing studies have demonstrated that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes may be expressed in a cell type-specific and allele-specific fashion. Single-cell gene expression assays have the potential to further resolve these expression patterns, but currently available methods do not perform allele-specific quantification at the molecule level. Here, we present scHLAcount, a post-processing workflow for single-cell RNA-seq data that computes allele-specific molecule counts of the HLA genes based on a personalized reference constructed from the sample's HLA genotypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: scHLAcount is available under the MIT license at https://github.com/10XGenomics/scHLAcount. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Charlotte A. Darby, Michael J. T. Stubbington, Patrick J. Marks, Álvaro Martínez Barrio, Ian T. Fiddes
Bioinform.1
2017 Xenolog classification
abstract
Motivation: Orthology analysis is a fundamental tool in comparative genomics. Sophisticated methods have been developed to distinguish between orthologs and paralogs and to classify paralogs into subtypes depending on the duplication mechanism and timing, relative to speciation. However, no comparable framework exists for xenologs: gene pairs whose history, since their divergence, includes a horizontal transfer. Further, the diversity of gene pairs that meet this broad definition calls for classification of xenologs with similar properties into subtypes. Results: We present a xenolog classification that uses phylogenetic reconciliation to assign each pair of genes to a class based on the event responsible for their divergence and the historical association between genes and species. Our classes distinguish between genes related through transfer alone and genes related through duplication and transfer. Further, they separate closely-related genes in distantly-related species from distantly-related genes in closely-related species. We present formal rules that assign gene pairs to specific xenolog classes, given a reconciled gene tree with an arbitrary number of duplications and transfers. These xenology classification rules have been implemented in software and tested on a collection of ∼13 000 prokaryotic gene families. In addition, we present a case study demonstrating the connection between xenolog classification and gene function prediction. Availability and Implementation: The xenolog classification rules have been implemented in N otung 2.9, a freely available phylogenetic reconciliation software package. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~durand/Notung . Gene trees are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/ds/1503 . Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Charlotte A. Darby, Maureen Stolzer, Patrick J. Ropp, Daniel Barker, Dannie Durand
Bioinform.1