EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timothy W. Behrens
dblp:197/8256
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-0339-5250ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › post-GWAS analysis
causal gene identification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | geneAttribution: trait agnostic identification of candidate genes associated with noncoding variation · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | geneAttribution: trait agnostic identification of candidate genes associated with noncoding variation · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › variant annotation
non-coding variant functional annotation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | geneAttribution: trait agnostic identification of candidate genes associated with noncoding variation · Bioinform. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hi-c genome conformation data · 0.3eQTL integration · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | geneAttribution: trait agnostic identification of candidate genes associated with noncoding variationabstractMotivation: We have developed geneAttribution, an R package that assigns candidate causal gene(s) to a risk variant identified by a genetic association study such as a GWAS. The method combines user-supplied functional annotation such as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) or Hi-C genome conformation data and reports the most likely candidate genes. In the absence of annotation data, geneAttribution relies on the distances between the genes and the input variant. Availability and Implementation: The package is freely available from http://www.bioconductor.org/ . A quick-start vignette is included with the package. Contact: [email protected]. Arthur Wuster, Diana Chang, Timothy W. Behrens, Tushar Bhangale |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2017 | Identifying and mitigating batch effects in whole genome sequencing dataabstractBACKGROUND: Large sample sets of whole genome sequencing with deep coverage are being generated, however assembling datasets from different sources inevitably introduces batch effects. These batch effects are not well understood and can be due to changes in the sequencing protocol or bioinformatics tools used to process the data. No systematic algorithms or heuristics exist to detect and filter batch effects or remove associations impacted by batch effects in whole genome sequencing data. RESULTS: We describe key quality metrics, provide a freely available software package to compute them, and demonstrate that identification of batch effects is aided by principal components analysis of these metrics. To mitigate batch effects, we developed new site-specific filters that identified and removed variants that falsely associated with the phenotype due to batch effect. These include filtering based on: a haplotype based genotype correction, a differential genotype quality test, and removing sites with missing genotype rate greater than 30% after setting genotypes with quality scores less than 20 to missing. This method removed 96.1% of unconfirmed genome-wide significant SNP associations and 97.6% of unconfirmed genome-wide significant indel associations. We performed analyses to demonstrate that: 1) These filters impacted variants known to be disease associated as 2 out of 16 confirmed associations in an AMD candidate SNP analysis were filtered, representing a reduction in power of 12.5%, 2) In the absence of batch effects, these filters removed only a small proportion of variants across the genome (type I error rate of 3%), and 3) in an independent dataset, the method removed 90.2% of unconfirmed genome-wide SNP associations and 89.8% of unconfirmed genome-wide indel associations. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers currently do not have effective tools to identify and mitigate batch effects in whole genome sequencing data. We developed and validated methods and filters to address this deficiency. Jennifer A. Tom, Jens Reeder, William F. Forrest, Robert R. Graham, Julie Hunkapiller, Timothy W. Behrens, Tushar R. Bhangale |
BMC Bioinform. | 6 |